Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31401212›Full record

ReviewPharmacological research2019

The new entries in the therapeutic armamentarium: The small molecule JAK inhibitors.

Katie Bechman, Mark Yates, James B Galloway

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The JAK-STAT pathway: from structural biology to cytokine engineering.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katie BechmanCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, Kings College London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: katie.bechman@kcl.ac.uk.
Mark YatesCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, Kings College London, United Kingdom.
James B GallowayCentre for Rheumatic Diseases, Kings College London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R001332/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed an explosion in trial data on JAK inhibitors (JAKi). These small molecules target the Janus kinase - signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway, blocking crucial cytokines across a septum of rheumatic diseases. As a class, JAKi are beginning to demonstrate efficacy on par, if not superior to biologics. Two first generation JAKi are licensed for use in inflammatory arthritis; tofacitinib and baricitinib. Next-generation JAKi have been designed with selective affinity for one JAK enzymes, the aim to reduce unwanted adverse effects without declining clinical efficacy. Emerging data with selective JAK1 inhibitors upadacitinib and filgotinib looks very promising. Despite differences in selectivity between JAKi, an overlap exists in their safety profiles. Across the class, a characteristic safety signal is emerging with viral opportunistic infections, particularly herpes zoster. Post marketing drug surveillance will be essential in evaluating the long-term risk with these agents.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsHumansJanus Kinase InhibitorsJanus KinasesSignal TransductionSTAT Transcription FactorsAntirheumatic AgentsJanus Kinase InhibitorsJanus KinasesSTAT Transcription FactorsBaricitinibJAK inhibitorsRheumatic diseaseTofacitinibUpadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID31401212
PMCPMC6876279
OpenAlexW2967609070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.