Trial reportThe American journal of medicine2020
Early Effects of Starting Doses of Enalapril in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure in the SOLVD Treatment Trial.
Trial report in The American journal of medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-COVID-19 era heart failure diagnosis and outcomes: adherence to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Guidelines.Open heart · 2026Article
- Science policies and practice of including and excluding women from clinical studies: focus on cardiovascular research.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- The Feasibility of a Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Rapid Up-Titration Programme Among Real-World Heart Failure Patients: A Multicentre Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Lower Risk of Death and Kidney Failure Associated with Higher Target (vs Below-Target) Doses of RAS Inhibitors in Octogenarians with HFrEF.The American journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Patterns of use and dose optimization of renin-angiotensin system modulators among chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction in resource-limited settings: a multicenter cohort study.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Consequences and Prognostic Impact of Multimorbidity in Heart Failure: Time to Act.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence approaches for phenotyping heart failure in U.S. Veterans Health Administration electronic health record.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Medicines optimization prior to discharge in patients admitted to hospital with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- New Challenges in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Managing Worsening Events.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Renin-Angiotensin Inhibition and Outcomes in HFrEF and Advanced Kidney Disease.The American journal of medicine · 2023Article
- 2023 Consensus of Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the Pharmacological Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2023Article
- Evaluation and Management of Patients With Diabetes and Heart Failure: A Korean Diabetes Association and Korean Society of Heart Failure Consensus Statement.International journal of heart failure · 2023Review
- Evaluation and Management of Patients with Diabetes and Heart Failure: A Korean Diabetes Association and Korean Society of Heart Failure Consensus Statement.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2023Review
- Contemporary Data on the Status and Medical Management of Acute Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2022Review
- Association between class of foundational medication for heart failure and prognosis in heart failure with reduced/mildly reduced ejection fraction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Network meta-analysis of medical therapy efficacy in more than 90,000 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.Journal of internal medicine · 2022Article
- Insights into foundational therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Clinical cardiology · 2022Review
- Drug therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: what is the 'right' dose?European journal of heart failure · 2022Review
- Foundational drugs for HFrEF: the growing evidence for a rapid sequencing strategy.The British journal of cardiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) treatment trial, similar clinical benefits were observed between starting doses of enalapril and the target dose achieved by postrandomization up-titration. In our current analysis, protecting the randomization, we examined the early effects of starting doses of enalapril.
methodsThere were 2569 patients with mild-to-moderate chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (ejection fraction ≤35%) randomized to receive starting doses (5-10 mg/day) of placebo (n = 1284) or enalapril (n = 1285). At day 14, both study drugs were blindly up-titrated to the target dose (20 mg/day). Overall, 96% (2458/2569) of the patients returned for dose up-titration, which was achieved in 59% (1444/2458), 48% (696/1444) of whom were in the enalapril group. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes in the enalapril group were estimated.
resultsHRs (95% CIs) for all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and the combined endpoint of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality at 14 days after randomization were 0.80 (0.32-2.03), 0.63 (0.35-1.12), and 0.65 (0.39-1.06), respectively. Corresponding HRs (95% CIs) at 30 days were 0.82 (0.41-1.67), 0.43 (0.27-0.68), and 0.43 (0.27-0.68), respectively. The magnitude of these early effects of starting doses of enalapril is similar to its previously reported long-term effects at the target dose.
conclusionThese data suggest that in stable ambulatory patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, the magnitude of the early effect of starting doses of enalapril is similar to that observed during longer-term therapy with the target doses of the drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.