Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31401165›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of medicine2020

Early Effects of Starting Doses of Enalapril in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure in the SOLVD Treatment Trial.

Phillip H Lam, Milton Packer, Gregg C Fonarow, Charles Faselis, Richard M Allman, Charity J Morgan, Steven N Singh, Bertram Pitt, Ali Ahmed

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Phillip H LamVeterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Milton PackerBaylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Gregg C FonarowUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Charles FaselisVeterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Richard M AllmanGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC.
Charity J MorganUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham.
Steven N SinghVeterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Bertram PittUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Ali AhmedVeterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; George Washington University, Washington, DC. Electronic address: ali.ahmed@va.gov.
George Washington University · USBaylor University Medical Center · USGeorgetown University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

Heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and renin-angiotensin system inhibitionR01HL085561 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI AHMED, ALI · 2006 to 2009
$1.5M
Neurohormonal Blockade and Outcomes in Diastolic Heart FailureR01HL097047 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI AHMED, ALI · 2009 to 2010
$915k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085561NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL097047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) treatment trial, similar clinical benefits were observed between starting doses of enalapril and the target dose achieved by postrandomization up-titration. In our current analysis, protecting the randomization, we examined the early effects of starting doses of enalapril.

methodsThere were 2569 patients with mild-to-moderate chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (ejection fraction ≤35%) randomized to receive starting doses (5-10 mg/day) of placebo (n = 1284) or enalapril (n = 1285). At day 14, both study drugs were blindly up-titrated to the target dose (20 mg/day). Overall, 96% (2458/2569) of the patients returned for dose up-titration, which was achieved in 59% (1444/2458), 48% (696/1444) of whom were in the enalapril group. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes in the enalapril group were estimated.

resultsHRs (95% CIs) for all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and the combined endpoint of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality at 14 days after randomization were 0.80 (0.32-2.03), 0.63 (0.35-1.12), and 0.65 (0.39-1.06), respectively. Corresponding HRs (95% CIs) at 30 days were 0.82 (0.41-1.67), 0.43 (0.27-0.68), and 0.43 (0.27-0.68), respectively. The magnitude of these early effects of starting doses of enalapril is similar to its previously reported long-term effects at the target dose.

conclusionThese data suggest that in stable ambulatory patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, the magnitude of the early effect of starting doses of enalapril is similar to that observed during longer-term therapy with the target doses of the drug.

Indexed as

AgedChronic DiseaseDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnalaprilFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedEnalaprilAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsEnalaprilHeart failureStarting dose

Identifiers

PMID31401165
PMCPMC10481707
OpenAlexW2968207448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.