Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31401119›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular biology2020

The Secret Life of Chromosome Loops upon DNA Double-Strand Break.

Coline Arnould, Gaëlle Legube

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Generation of Radioresistant Prostate Cancer Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Single-Strand Annealing in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Coline ArnouldLBCMCP, Centre de Biologie Integrative (CBI), CNRS, Université de Toulouse, UT3, Toulouse, France.
Gaëlle LegubeLBCMCP, Centre de Biologie Integrative (CBI), CNRS, Université de Toulouse, UT3, Toulouse, France. Electronic address: gaelle.legube@univ-tlse3.fr.
Université de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are harmful lesions that severely challenge genomic integrity, and recent evidence suggests that DSBs occur more frequently on the genome than previously thought. These lesions activate a complex and multilayered response called the DNA damage response, which allows to coordinate their repair with the cell cycle progression. While the mechanistic details of repair processes have been narrowed, thanks to several decades of intense studies, our knowledge of the impact of DSB on chromatin composition and chromosome architecture is still very sparse. However, the recent development of various tools to induce DSB at annotated loci, compatible with next-generation sequencing-based approaches, is opening a new framework to tackle these questions. Here we discuss the influence of initial and DSB-induced chromatin conformation and the strong potential of 3C-based technologies to decipher the contribution of chromosome architecture during DSB repair.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairMolecular ConformationChromatinMacromolecular SubstancesChromatinMacromolecular SubstanceschromatinDNA double-strand breaks repairDSB clusteringtopologically associating domainsγH2AX

Identifiers

PMID31401119
PMCPMC7057266
OpenAlexW2968001579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.