Trial reportThe Lancet. Haematology2019
Idarubicin, cytarabine, and nivolumab in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a single-arm, phase 2 study.
Trial report in The Lancet. Haematology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Updates from a single-center phase 2 study of PD-1 inhibitor combined with hypomethylating agent plus CAG regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Trial
- Sintilimab plus decitabine for higher-risk treatment-naïve myelodysplastic syndromes: efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of a phase II, single-arm trial.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Trial
- Phase II Trial of Pembrolizumab after High-Dose Cytarabine in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Blood cancer discovery · 2021Trial
- Pandora's Box of AML: HowBiomedicines · 2025Review
- Hotspots evolution and frontiers of immunotherapy for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: A bibliometric analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Molecular and Clinical Insights intoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Endogenous T cell responses to fusion-derived neoantigens in pediatric acute leukemias.Leukemia · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety, and Prognostic Value of Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Updated Meta-Analysis of a 5-Year Study.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2025Review
- TP53-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Unanswered Questions.Hematological oncology · 2025Review
- TP53 -Mutated Myeloid Neoplasms: 2024 Update on Diagnosis, Risk-Stratification, and Management.American journal of hematology · 2025Review
- Immune Escape of Acute Myeloid Leukemia after Transplantation.Blood cancer discovery · 2025Review
- A review of common immunotherapy and nano immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- What have we learned about TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia?Blood cancer journal · 2024Review
- Characterization of stem cell landscape and assessing the stemness degree to aid clinical therapeutics in hematologic malignancies.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Immune-dysregulation harnessing in myeloid neoplasms.Cancer medicine · 2024Review
- Advancements in Personalized CAR-T Therapy: Comprehensive Overview of Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Hematological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Review
- Precision Medicine Approaches in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Adverse Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOutcomes for younger patients with acute myeloid leukaemia have moderately improved over the past two decades owing to better supportive care and recent introduction of novel targeted agents. Blocking PD-1 and its ligand's pathways enhances antileukaemia responses by enabling T cells in murine models. We aimed to assess the addition of nivolumab to frontline therapy with idarubicin and cytarabine in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.
methodsThis single-arm, phase 2 part of the phase 1-2 study of nivolumab in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine was done at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Eligible patients were aged 18-60 years (or >60 years if suitable for intensive chemotherapy), and had newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Induction included cytarabine 1·5 g/m
findingsBetween Aug 7, 2015, and June 2, 2018, 44 patients were enrolled of whom 22 (50%) had adverse genetic risk by European Leukaemia Network classification. All patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy. At a median follow-up of 17·25 months (IQR 0·50-30·40), median event-free survival was not reached (95% CI 7·93-NR). Median relapse-free survival of responders was 18·54 months (95% CI 8·20-23·22). The median overall survival was 18·54 months (95% CI 10·81-28·81). Six patients had seven grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events with two cases of rash, two of colitis, and one each of transaminitis, pancreatitis, and cholecystitis. 19 (43%) of 44 patients achieved a response and proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation, with grade 3-4 graft-versus-host disease observed in five (26%). No treatment related deaths were attributed to nivolumab.
interpretationAddition of nivolumab to induction chemotherapy with idarubicin and cytarabine is feasible in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Post-transplant severe graft-versus-host disease could be improved, and earlier initiation of checkpoint inhibitor therapy is warranted in future studies.
fundingThe MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant CA016672, and the MD Anderson Cancer Center Leukaemia SPORE CA100632 from the National Cancer Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.