Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31400115›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

Dynamic architecture of the Escherichia coli structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complex, MukBEF.

Karthik V Rajasekar, Rachel Baker, Gemma L M Fisher, Jani R Bolla, Jarno Mäkelä, Minzhe Tang, Katarzyna Zawadzka, Oliwia Koczy, Florence Wagner, Carol V Robinson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DNA sliding and loop formation byBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karthik V RajasekarDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Rachel BakerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Gemma L M FisherDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Jani R BollaChemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, 12 Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, UK.
Jarno MäkeläDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Minzhe TangDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Katarzyna ZawadzkaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Oliwia KoczyDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Florence WagnerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Carol V RobinsonChemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, 12 Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, UK.
Lidia K ArciszewskaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
David J SherrattDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I004785/1Medical Research Council MR/N020413/1Wellcome Trust 200782/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ubiquitous Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) complexes use a proteinaceous ring-shaped architecture to organize and individualize chromosomes, thereby facilitating chromosome segregation. They utilize cycles of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding and hydrolysis to transport themselves rapidly with respect to DNA, a process requiring protein conformational changes and multiple DNA contact sites. By analysing changes in the architecture and stoichiometry of the Escherichia coli SMC complex, MukBEF, as a function of nucleotide binding to MukB and subsequent ATP hydrolysis, we demonstrate directly the formation of dimer of MukBEF dimer complexes, dependent on dimeric MukF kleisin. Using truncated and full length MukB, in combination with MukEF, we show that engagement of the MukB ATPase heads on nucleotide binding directs the formation of dimers of heads-engaged dimer complexes. Complex formation requires functional interactions between the C- and N-terminal domains of MukF with the MukB head and neck, respectively, and MukE, which organizes the complexes by stabilizing binding of MukB heads to MukF. In the absence of head engagement, a MukF dimer bound by MukE forms complexes containing only a dimer of MukB. Finally, we demonstrate that cells expressing MukBEF complexes in which MukF is monomeric are Muk-, with the complexes failing to associate with chromosomes.

Indexed as

Chromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosomesDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsMukB protein, E colimukE protein, E colimukF protein, E coliMultiprotein ComplexesRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31400115
PMCPMC6765140
OpenAlexW2967009187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.