ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019
Improving the power of objective response detection of evoked responses in noise by using average and product of magnitude-squared coherence of two different signals.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective response detection (ORD) techniques such as the magnitude-squared coherence (MSC) are mathematical methods tailored to detect potentials evoked by an external periodic stimulation. The performance of the MSC is directly proportional to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the recorded signal and the time spent for collecting data. An alternative to increasing the performance of detection techniques without increasing data recording time is to use the information from more than one signal simultaneously. In this context, this work proposes two new detection techniques based on the average and on the product of MSCs of two different signals. The critical values and detection probabilities were obtained theoretically and using a Monte Carlo simulation. The performances of the new detectors were evaluated using synthetic data and electroencephalogram (EEG) signals during photo and auditory stimulation. For the synthetic signals, the two proposed detectors exhibited a higher detection rate when compared to the rate of the traditional MSC technique. When applied to EEG signals, these detectors resulted in an increase of the mean detection rate in relation to MSC for visual and auditory stimulation of at least 25% and 13.21%, respectively. The proposed detectors may be considered as promising tools for clinical applications. Graphical Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31399896What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.