Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31399879›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020

"Less is better"-always true?

Franca Dicuonzo, Stefano Purciariello, Stefano Andresciani, Aurora De Marco, Antonio Colamaria, Antonio Calace

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Franca DicuonzoDepartment of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Department of Basic Med Sci Neurosci & Sense Organs, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy. franca.dicuonzo@uniba.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3999-6346
Stefano PurciarielloDepartment of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Department of Basic Med Sci Neurosci & Sense Organs, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Stefano AndrescianiDepartment of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Department of Basic Med Sci Neurosci & Sense Organs, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Aurora De MarcoDepartment of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Department of Basic Med Sci Neurosci & Sense Organs, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Antonio ColamariaDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Department of Basic Med Sci Neurosci & Sense Organs, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Antonio CalaceDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Department of Basic Med Sci Neurosci & Sense Organs, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study is to try to explain what an overtreatment is and which ones are the possible risks related to an excess of simplification in the medical practice, through the description of an emblematic clinical case.

methodsIn the present article, we report the case of a female patient aged 57 who complained about lower back pain and crural neuralgia and had a lumbar and sacral magnetic resonance imaging performed in the Department of Neuroradiology in Bari showing suspicious repetitive bone lesions; therefore, the patient underwent several medical procedures and laboratory exams which ended with a surgical removal of a left L3-L4 foraminal disc herniation and a bone biopsy.

resultsWhen it was finally possible to exclude any other diseases including thyroid neoplasms, a "reassuring" osteoporosis diagnosis has been made since the lesions were likely to be degenerative and the patient underwent menopause 7 years ago. However, the multiplicity of the lesions of the vertebrae and of the pelvic bones as well as their signal could not be ignored, so that a close magnetic resonance imaging follow-up has been recommended.

conclusionsThe present case is therefore a good example of overtreatment which may lead to delicate questions, investigating any possible mistakes in the diagnosis procedure as well as the role that defensive medicine is playing nowadays on medical procedures and the economic impact that all this can have on our healthcare system. In the end, we may ask ourselves: is "less" better or is "more" always "more?"

Indexed as

FemaleHumansIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMedical OveruseMiddle AgedOsteoporosisSacrumDefensive medicineHealthcare systemMagnetic resonance imagingMedical practiceOversimplifyingOvertreatment

Identifiers

PMID31399879
OpenAlexW2967889741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.