Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31399878›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2019

Analysis of the clinical effect and long-term follow-up results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of complicated upper ureteral calculi (report of 206 cases followed for 10 years).

Keyi Wang, Guangchun Wang, Heng Shi, Haimin Zhang, Jianhua Huang, Jiang Geng, Lei Yin, Tianrun Huang, Bo Peng

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Keyi WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 301, Yanchang Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Guangchun WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 301, Yanchang Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Heng ShiDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 301, Yanchang Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Haimin ZhangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 301, Yanchang Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Jianhua HuangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 301, Yanchang Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Jiang GengDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 301, Yanchang Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Lei YinDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 301, Yanchang Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Tianrun HuangDepartment of Urology, North Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201900, China.
Bo PengDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 301, Yanchang Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200072, China. pengbo6908@163.com.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNTongji University · CNHuashan Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81870517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo summarize the experience of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLU) in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and long-term follow-up results and compare them with ureteroscopic lithotomy (URL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

methodsThe clinical data of 585 patients with complex upper ureteral calculi who met the inclusion criteria from January 2006 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 206 cases treated with RLU, 201 cases treated with URL and 178 cases treated with PCNL. The operation time, hospitalization time, stone clearance rate, incidence of postoperative complications and recurrence rate were observed and compared among the three groups.

resultsAmong 585 eligible patients, 206 cases were treated with RLU, 201 cases were treated with URL and 178 cases were treated with PCNL. The stone clearance rate (98.54%), postoperative complication types and rate (0.97%) in the RLU group were superior to those in the URL group and the PCNL group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate (3.88%) between the RLU group and the other two groups (P > 0.05).

conclusionRetroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy has many advantages in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi, including high stone clearance rate, less complications especially in ureteral stricture. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is also safe to treat upper ureteral calculi accompanied with severe urinary tract infection.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetroperitoneal SpaceRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUreteral CalculiCurative effectsPercutaneous nephrolithotomyRetroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomyUpper ureteral calculiUreteroscopic lithotripsy

Identifiers

PMID31399878
OpenAlexW2967810495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.