Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31399762›Full record

SynthesisCurrent atherosclerosis reports2019

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ka Hou Christien Li, Ka Hei Gabriel Wong, Mengqi Gong, Tong Liu, Guangping Li, Yunlong Xia, Jeffery Ho, Luis Nombela-Franco, Abhishek C Sawant, Simon Eccleshall and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dilemmas in cardiology: when to recanalize a chronic total occlusion.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ka Hou Christien LiDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, People's Republic of China.
Ka Hei Gabriel WongDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, People's Republic of China.
Mengqi GongTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China.
Tong LiuTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China.
Guangping LiTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, People's Republic of China.
Yunlong XiaDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Jeffery HoLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, People's Republic of China.
Luis Nombela-FrancoCardiology Department, Instituto Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Abhishek C SawantDivision of Interventional Cardiology, Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Simon EccleshallNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital and Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Gary TseDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, People's Republic of China.
Vassilios S VassiliouNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital and Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. V.Vassiliou@uea.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewChronic total occlusion (CTO) of the coronary arteries is a significant clinical problem and has traditionally been treated by medical therapy or coronary artery bypass grafting. Recent studies have examined percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as an alternative option. RECENT

findingsThis systematic review and meta-analysis compared medical therapy to PCI for treating CTOs. PubMed and Embase were searched from their inception to March 2019 for studies that compared medical therapy and PCI for clinical outcomes in patients with CTOs. Quality of the included studies was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The results were pooled by DerSimonian and Laird random- or fixed-effect models as appropriate. Heterogeneity between studies and publication bias was evaluated by I

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseCoronary AngiographyCoronary OcclusionCoronary VesselsFibrinolytic AgentsHumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionThrombolytic TherapyFibrinolytic AgentsAdverse outcomesChronic total occlusionMortality

Identifiers

PMID31399762
PMCPMC6689032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.