ArticleNature biotechnology2019
Separating neuroethics from neurohype.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating neural organoids and AI: increasing the risk of artificial consciousness or medical malpractice?Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Article
- Does brain-computer interface-based mind reading threaten mental privacy? ethical reflections from interviews with Chinese experts.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Wearables for tracking mental state in the classroom: ethical considerations from the literature and high school students.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2025Article
- Conflicting Interests and New Frontiers: A Role for Virtue Ethics in Cutting Edge Brain Research with Humans.Neuroethics · 2025Article
- Neurorights in the Constitution: from neurotechnology to ethics and politics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Human brain organoids and their ethical issues : Navigating the moral and social challenges between hype and underestimation.EMBO reports · 2024Article
- Advocating for neurodata privacy and neurotechnology regulation.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- Workshops of the Eighth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: BCIs: The Next Frontier.Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England) · 2022Article
- Researchers' Ethical Concerns About Using Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Enhancement.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Novel Neurorights: From Nonsense to Substance.Neuroethics · 2022Article
- Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in Consumer Neuroergonomics.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2021Article
- Privacy Challenges to the Democratization of Brain Data.iScience · 2020Review
- Translational Neuroethics: A Vision for a More Integrated, Inclusive, and Impactful Field.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
- The Urgent Need to Better Integrate Neuroscience and Neuroethics.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
- Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnology: A Grounded Appraisal.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31399721What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.