ArticleBritish dental journal2019
The dental health of cleft patients attending the 18-month-old clinic at a specialised cleft centre.
Article in British dental journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of the Pediatric Dentist in the Multidisciplinary Management of the Cleft Lip Palate Patient.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) patients are at high risk of developing dental caries and show a greater prevalence of dental defects.Aims To establish if CLP patients who attended the 18-month clinic had local dentists, were complying with oral hygiene instruction and had stopped bottle-feeding as per guidelines.Design Data were collected retrospectively over a 24-month period in which a total of 62 records were assessed.Results Data analyses revealed that 42% of patients who attended the clinic were registered with a dentist. Fifty percent of patients had stopped bottle-feeding and 67% were brushing two or more times a day. Although all patients reviewed on the clinic were caries free, 57% presented with a dental anomaly (hypodontia, hypomineralisation or hypoplasia).Conclusion Despite CLP patients being at high risk for developing dental caries, results showed that significant proportions of parents/carers were not following national guidelines for prevention. This evaluation highlights that shared preventive support between primary care dentists and specialist cleft dentists is not being achieved in the majority of cases. It also recognises that parents of CLP patients are either not receiving, or are failing to implement, preventive care advice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31399677What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.