Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31399609›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2019

Corporeal Compression at the Onset of Septic shock (COCOONs): a compression method to reduce fluid balance of septic shock patients.

Auguste Dargent, Audrey Large, Agnès Soudry-Faure, Jean-Marc Doise, Caroline Abdulmalak, Lysiane Jonval, Pascal Andreu, Jean-Baptiste Roudaut, Sébastien Prin, Pierre-Emmanuel Charles and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02656654 (Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of and the Tolerance to a Body Bandage to Maintain Fluid Balance in Patients With Severe Sepsis or in Septic Shock in an ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02656654 nacompletednot on this map

Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of and the Tolerance to a Body Bandage to Maintain Fluid Balance in Patients With Severe Sepsis or in Septic Shock in an ICU

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRan2015 to 2017Enrolled64ConditionsSevere Sepsis or Septic Shock, Fluid ResuscitationArmsWhole-body compression
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Where does the fluid go?Annals of intensive care · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Auguste DargentDepartment of intensive care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France. auguste.dargent@chu-dijon.fr.
Audrey LargeDepartment of intensive care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Agnès Soudry-FaureCHU Dijon Bourgogne, Clinical Research Unit-Methodological Support Network, Dijon, France.
Jean-Marc DoiseDepartment of intensive care, William Morey Hospital, Chalon-sur-Saône, France.
Caroline AbdulmalakDepartment of intensive care, William Morey Hospital, Chalon-sur-Saône, France.
Lysiane JonvalCHU Dijon Bourgogne, Clinical Research Unit-Methodological Support Network, Dijon, France.
Pascal AndreuDepartment of intensive care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Jean-Baptiste RoudautDepartment of intensive care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Sébastien PrinDepartment of intensive care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Pierre-Emmanuel CharlesDepartment of intensive care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Didier PayenUMR 1160 INSERM, Paris 7 University, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Jean-Pierre QuenotDepartment of intensive care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France.
COCOONs study group
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluid overload in septic intensive care unit (ICU) patients is common and strongly associated with poor outcome. There is currently no treatment for capillary leak, which is mainly responsible for high positive fluid balance (FB) in sepsis. We hypothesized that increasing interstitial pressure with extensive corporeal compression would reduce FB. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a compression treatment during sepsis. This pilot, two-center, single-arm trial enrolled critically ill, non-surgical, septic patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The therapeutic intervention was the early application of compression bandages on more than 80% of the body surface. The primary outcome was negative net FB on day 7. The primary endpoint was reached in 29 of 45 patients (64%) with available data, for a planned objective of 26. By day 4, cumulative FB was 7280 ml [3300-9700]. SOFA- and aged-matched patients from a historical cohort had a significantly higher FB at 1, 2 and 7 days. Tolerance was good, although low-stage pressure ulcers were observed in 16 patients (26%). No effect on intra-abdominal pressure or respiratory plateau pressure was observed. In conclusion, corporeal compression demonstrated potential efficacy in limiting FB during septic shock, with acceptable feasibility and tolerance.

Indexed as

Compression BandagesWater-Electrolyte BalanceAgedCritical CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialShock, Septic

Identifiers

PMID31399609
PMCPMC6689006
OpenAlexW2967842815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.