Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31399575›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2019

Effects of the Spirometry Learning Module on the knowledge, confidence, and experience of spirometry operators.

Richard Parsons, David Schembri, Kerry Hancock, Anne Lonergan, Christopher Barton, Tjard Schermer, Alan Crockett, Peter Frith, Tanja Effing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Richard ParsonsDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia. Richard.parsons@sa.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8005-9683
David SchembriDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Kerry HancockChandlers Hill Surgery, Happy Valley, SA, Australia.
Anne LonerganIntermediate Care Services, Noarlunga GP Plus, Noarlunga, SA, Australia.
Christopher BartonDepartment of General Practice, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Tjard SchermerDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Alan CrockettAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), School of Health Sciences & Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Peter FrithCollege of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Tanja EffingDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our study measures effects of the Spirometry Learning Module (SLM) on health-care professionals' knowledge of spirometry test quality and perceived confidence, experience, and understanding of spirometry measurements and interpretation. Professionals from both primary and hospital-based settings enrolled in the SLM, a training model focusing on spirometry test performance and interpretation, including an online interactive learning component and a face-to-face workshop. Participants were asked to submit patient spirometry assessment worksheets for feedback on quality and interpretation. Data were collected at baseline, SLM completion (20 weeks), and 12 months after SLM completion. Knowledge of spirometry test quality was evaluated with questions relating to five case-based assessments of common spirometric patterns. Perceived confidence, experience, and knowledge in test performance were measured using a 7-point Likert scale. The Friedman test combined with post hoc analyses were used to analyse differences between baseline, 20-week, and 12-month post completion. Qualitative interviews were performed to assess reasons for non-completion. Of the 90 participants enrolled in the SLM and consented to research, 48 completed the 20-week measurement and 11 completed the 12-month measurement. Statistically significant improvements were detected in all outcomes in participants who completed the SLM to 20-week and 12-month follow-up assessments (all p values < 0.01). Barriers to completion were limited access to patients requiring spirometry, high clinic workload, and having a different spirometer at the workplace compared to the one used during SLM demonstrations. Our data suggest that participants' confidence, experience, and knowledge regarding spirometry may improve through SLM completion.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeChronic DiseaseFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleRespiratory Tract DiseasesSpirometry

Identifiers

PMID31399575
PMCPMC6689054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.