Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31399574›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

The Hsp90 isoforms from S. cerevisiae differ in structure, function and client range.

Hannah Girstmair, Franziska Tippel, Abraham Lopez, Katarzyna Tych, Frank Stein, Per Haberkant, Philipp Werner Norbert Schmid, Dominic Helm, Matthias Rief, Michael Sattler and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hsp90: A means to an end.Cell stress & chaperones · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hannah GirstmairCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Franziska TippelCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Abraham LopezCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1355-8006
Katarzyna TychCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Physics, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9091-0507
Frank SteinProteomics Core Facility, EMBL Heidelberg, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9695-1692
Per HaberkantProteomics Core Facility, EMBL Heidelberg, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp Werner Norbert SchmidCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Dominic HelmProteomics Core Facility, EMBL Heidelberg, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9321-2069
Matthias RiefCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Physics, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Michael SattlerCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Johannes BuchnerCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany. johannes.buchner@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1282-7737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular chaperone Hsp90 is an important regulator of proteostasis. It has remained unclear why S. cerevisiae possesses two Hsp90 isoforms, the constitutively expressed Hsc82 and the stress-inducible Hsp82. Here, we report distinct differences despite a sequence identity of 97%. Consistent with its function under stress conditions, Hsp82 is more stable and refolds more efficiently than Hsc82. The two isoforms also differ in their ATPases and conformational cycles. Hsc82 is more processive and populates closed states to a greater extent. Variations in the N-terminal ATP-binding domain modulate its dynamics and conformational cycle. Despite these differences, the client interactomes are largely identical, but isoform-specific interactors exist both under physiological and heat shock conditions. Taken together, changes mainly in the N-domain create a stress-specific, more resilient protein with a shifted activity profile. Thus, the precise tuning of the Hsp90 isoforms preserves the basic mechanism but adapts it to specific needs.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesAmino Acid SequenceHeat-Shock ResponseHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular ChaperonesProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProtein IsoformsProtein StabilitySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence AlignmentStress, PhysiologicalAdenosine TriphosphatasesHSP82 protein, S cerevisiaeHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsLigandsMolecular ChaperonesProtein IsoformsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31399574
PMCPMC6689086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.