Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31399564›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Myosin IIA and formin dependent mechanosensitivity of filopodia adhesion.

N O Alieva, A K Efremov, S Hu, D Oh, Z Chen, M Natarajan, H T Ong, A Jégou, G Romet-Lemonne, J T Groves and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Myosin II-independent contraction of actin filaments in membrane nanotubes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cellular Uptake of Phase-Separating Peptide Coacervates.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Chiral growth of adherent filopodia.Biophysical journal · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

N O AlievaMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, T-lab, 5A Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117411, Singapore.
A K EfremovMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, T-lab, 5A Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117411, Singapore.
S HuMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, T-lab, 5A Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117411, Singapore.
D OhMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, T-lab, 5A Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117411, Singapore.
Z ChenMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, T-lab, 5A Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117411, Singapore.
M NatarajanMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, T-lab, 5A Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117411, Singapore.
H T OngMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, T-lab, 5A Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117411, Singapore.
A JégouInstitut Jacques Monod, CNRS, Université de Paris, 15 rue Helene Brion, F-75013, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-3127
G Romet-LemonneInstitut Jacques Monod, CNRS, Université de Paris, 15 rue Helene Brion, F-75013, Paris, France.
J T GrovesMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, T-lab, 5A Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117411, Singapore.
M P SheetzMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, T-lab, 5A Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117411, Singapore.
J YanMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, T-lab, 5A Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117411, Singapore.
A D BershadskyMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, T-lab, 5A Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117411, Singapore. alexander.bershadsky@weizmann.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9571-7375

Funding

Tropomyosin and tyrosine kinases in mechanics of cancerR01GM113022 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI SHEETZ, MICHAEL PATRICK · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Filopodia, dynamic membrane protrusions driven by polymerization of an actin filament core, can adhere to the extracellular matrix and experience both external and cell-generated pulling forces. The role of such forces in filopodia adhesion is however insufficiently understood. Here, we study filopodia induced by overexpression of myosin X, typical for cancer cells. The lifetime of such filopodia positively correlates with the presence of myosin IIA filaments at the filopodia bases. Application of pulling forces to the filopodia tips through attached fibronectin-coated laser-trapped beads results in sustained growth of the filopodia. Pharmacological inhibition or knockdown of myosin IIA abolishes the filopodia adhesion to the beads. Formin inhibitor SMIFH2, which causes detachment of actin filaments from formin molecules, produces similar effect. Thus, centripetal force generated by myosin IIA filaments at the base of filopodium and transmitted to the tip through actin core in a formin-dependent fashion is required for filopodia adhesion.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsForminsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHeLa CellsHumansMicrofilament ProteinsMyosinsNeoplasmsNonmuscle Myosin Type IIAPseudopodiaThionesUracilForminsMicrofilament ProteinsMYO10 protein, humanMyosinsNonmuscle Myosin Type IIASMIFH2 compoundThionesUracil

Identifiers

PMID31399564
PMCPMC6689027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.