Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31399459›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Acupotomy versus acupuncture for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bin Chen, Cai Zhang, Ren-Pan Zhang, An-Yang Lin, Zhong-Biao Xiu, Jing Liu, Hong-Jia Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bin ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2459-1605
Cai ZhangGraduate School, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Ren-Pan ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
An-Yang LinDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Zhong-Biao XiuDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Jing LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Hong-Jia ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is the most common pattern of cervical spondylosis, which is a serious and common degenerative disease. Both acupotomy and acupuncture have been widely used clinically to treat CSR in China with satisfied efficacy. However, there is no systematic review comparing the effectiveness of these two therapies. The aim of this study is to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety between acupotomy and acupuncture for patients with CSR to provide evidence for clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The following electronic databases will be searched: Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure , China Biology Medicine disc, Wanfang Database and Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP). The randomised controlled trials of acupotomy versus acupuncture with/without additional treatment for CSR will be searched in the databases from their inception to December 2018 by two researchers independently. Visual analogue scale, symptom score and neck disability index will be assessed as the primary outcomes. The total effective rate, curative rate, adverse events and amount of rescue medication used will be assessed as the secondary outcomes. The Review Manager 5.3 will be used for meta-analysis and the evidence level will be assessed by using the method for Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Continuous outcomes will be presented as the weighted mean difference or standardised mean difference with 95% CI, whereas dichotomous data will be expressed as relative risk with 95% CI. If the included studies have existing heterogeneity (p<0.05), then a random-effects model will be used. Otherwise, we will calculate using a fixed-effects model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required because no primary data are collected. This review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at an international academic conference for dissemination. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019117348.

Indexed as

Research DesignAcupuncture TherapyHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPatient SafetySpondylosisSystematic Reviews as Topicacupotomyacupuncturecervical spondylotic radiculopathymeta-analysisprotocolsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31399459
PMCPMC6701683
OpenAlexW2968445321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.