Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31399448›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2019

Glutathione infusion before primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomised controlled pilot study.

Gaetano Tanzilli, Giovanni Truscelli, Alessio Arrivi, Roberto Carnevale, Attilio Placanica, Nicola Viceconte, Valeria Raparelli, Rita Mele, Vittoria Cammisotto, Cristina Nocella and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. A Pilot Study on theAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gaetano TanzilliDepartment of Heart and Great Vessels, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni TruscelliDepartment of Heart and Great Vessels, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alessio ArriviDepartment of Cardiology, "Santa Maria" Hospital, Terni, Italy.
Roberto CarnevaleDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University, Latina, Italy.
Attilio PlacanicaDepartment of Cardiology, "San Giovanni Evangelista" Hospital, Tivoli, Italy.
Nicola ViceconteDepartment of Heart and Great Vessels, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Valeria RaparelliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Rita MeleDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Vittoria CammisottoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Cristina NocellaInternal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Sapienza University of Rome.
Francesco BarillàDepartment of Heart and Great Vessels, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luigi LucisanoDepartment of Cardiology, "San Giovanni Evangelista" Hospital, Tivoli, Italy.
Mauro PennacchiDepartment of Cardiology, "San Giovanni Evangelista" Hospital, Tivoli, Italy.
Antonino GranatelliDepartment of Cardiology, "San Giovanni Evangelista" Hospital, Tivoli, Italy.
Marcello DominiciDepartment of Cardiology, "Santa Maria" Hospital, Terni, Italy.
Stefania BasiliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Carlo GaudioDepartment of Heart and Great Vessels, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Enrico MangieriDepartment of Heart and Great Vessels, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITOspedale Maggiore · ITSanta Maria Nuova Hospital · ITClinica Mediterranea · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the setting of reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) contributes to reperfusion injury. Among ROS, hydrogen peroxide (H

methodsFifty consecutive patients with STEMI, scheduled to undergo primary angioplasty, were randomly assigned, before intervention, to receive an infusion of GSH (2500 mg/25 mL over 10 min), followed by drug administration at the same doses at 24, 48 and 72 hours elapsing time or placebo. Peripheral blood samples were obtained before and at the end of the procedure, as well as after 5 days. H

resultsFollowing acute reperfusion, a significant reduction of H

conclusionThe prophylactic and prolonged infusion of GSH seems to determine a rapid onset and persistent blunting of H TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUDRACT 2014-00448625; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCoronary CirculationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlutathioneHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleOxidative StressPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPilot ProjectsPreoperative CareReactive Oxygen SpeciesBiomarkersGlutathioneReactive Oxygen SpeciesTroponinglutathione:hydrogen peroxidepercutaneous coronary interventionsreactive oxygen speciesreperfusion injurySTEMI

Identifiers

PMID31399448
PMCPMC6701599
OpenAlexW2968973260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.