Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31399121›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2019

Is it time to change the reference genome?

Sara Ballouz, Alexander Dobin, Jesse A Gillis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Lossless pangenome indexing using tag arrays.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2026
    Article
  8. The pangenome ofiScience · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Polymorphic 3D genome architecture mediated by transposable elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The chromosome-level genome of Chinese indicine cattle breed provides insights into bovine adaptation and immunity.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Telomeric assemblies ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Pangenome-aware DeepVariant.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara BallouzCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, The Stanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 11724, USA.
Alexander DobinCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, The Stanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 11724, USA.
Jesse A GillisCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, The Stanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 11724, USA. jgillis@cshl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0936-9774

Funding

Novel algorithm development, user support and maintenance for STARR01HG009318 · NHGRI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI DOBIN, ALEXANDER · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Revealing the transcriptomic basis of neuronal identity through functional meta-analysisR01MH113005 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI GILLIS, JESSE · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Heuristics to evaluate biomedical and genomic knowledge bases for validityR01LM012736 · NLM · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI GILLIS, JESSE · 2017 to 2020
$1.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009318NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG009318NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113005NIMH NIH HHS R01MH113005NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012736U.S. National Library of Medicine R01LM012736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of the human reference genome has shaped methods and data across modern genomics. This has offered many benefits while creating a few constraints. In the following opinion, we outline the history, properties, and pitfalls of the current human reference genome. In a few illustrative analyses, we focus on its use for variant-calling, highlighting its nearness to a 'type specimen'. We suggest that switching to a consensus reference would offer important advantages over the continued use of the current reference with few disadvantages.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanGenomicsHumansReference Standards

Identifiers

PMID31399121
PMCPMC6688217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.