Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31399052›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2019

Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review.

Nedra S Whitehead, Laurina O Williams, Sreelatha Meleth, Sara M Kennedy, Nneka Ubaka-Blackmoore, Sharon M Geaghan, James H Nichols, Patrick Carroll, Michael T McEvoy, Julie Gayken and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Nedra S WhiteheadRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Laurina O WilliamsDivision of Laboratory Systems, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, MS G25, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. low1@cdc.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-7274-4314
Sreelatha MelethRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Sara M KennedyRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Nneka Ubaka-BlackmooreRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Sharon M GeaghanDepartment of Pathology, Pediatrics Division, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
James H NicholsVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Patrick CarrollDivision of Neonatology, Intermountain Healthcare , St. George, UT, USA.
Michael T McEvoyAlbany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
Julie GaykenJulie Gayken Laboratory Consulting, St. Cloud, MN, USA.
Dennis J ErnstCenter for Phlebotomy Education, Inc, Corydon, IN, USA.
Christine LitwinClinical Immunology and Referral Testing, Medical University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Paul EpnerPaul Epner, LLC, Evanston, IL, USA.
Jennifer TaylorRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Mark L GraberRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
RTI International · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USIntermountain Healthcare · USMedical University of South Carolina · USStanford University · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

CDC HHS Contract #200-2013-M-53964B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs many as 90% of patients develop anemia by their third day in an intensive care unit (ICU). We evaluated the efficacy of interventions to reduce phlebotomy-related blood loss on the volume of blood lost, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, and incidence of anemia.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP) systematic review methods for rating study quality and assessing the body of evidence. Searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, PsychINFO, and CINAHL identified 2564 published references. We included studies of the impact of interventions to reduce phlebotomy-related blood loss on blood loss, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, or anemia among hospital inpatients. We excluded studies not published in English and studies that did not have a comparison group, did not report an outcome of interest, or were rated as poor quality. Twenty-one studies met these criteria. We conducted a meta-analysis if > 2 homogenous studies reported sufficient information for analysis.

resultsWe found moderate, consistent evidence that devices that return blood from flushing venous or arterial lines to the patient reduced blood loss by approximately 25% in both neonatal ICU (NICU) and adult ICU patients [pooled estimate in adults, 24.7 (95% CI = 12.1-37.3)]. Bundled interventions that included blood conservation devices appeared to reduce blood loss by at least 25% (suggestive evidence). The evidence was insufficient to determine if these devices reduced hemoglobin decline or risk of anemia. The evidence suggested that small volume tubes reduced the risk of anemia, but was insufficient to determine if they affected the volume of blood loss or the rate of hemoglobin decline.

conclusionsModerate, consistent evidence indicated that devices that return blood from testing or flushing lines to the patient reduce the volume of blood loss by approximately 25% among ICU patients. The results of this systematic review support the use of blood conservation systems with arterial or venous catheters to eliminate blood waste when drawing blood for testing. The evidence was insufficient to conclude the devices impacted hemoglobin levels or transfusion rates. The use of small volume tubes may reduce the risk of anemia.

Indexed as

AnemiaHumansIatrogenic DiseaseIntensive Care UnitsPhlebotomyPractice Guidelines as TopicAnemiaBlood conservation strategyClinical laboratory techniquesIatrogenic diseasesPhlebotomy

Identifiers

PMID31399052
PMCPMC6688222
OpenAlexW2968046656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.