Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31398957›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Bilateral Tactile Feedback-Enabled Training for Stroke Survivors Using Microsoft Kinect

Abbas Orand, Eren Erdal Aksoy, Hiroyuki Miyasaka, Carolyn Weeks Levy, Xin Zhang, Carlo Menon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Augmented reality for stroke rehabilitation during COVID-19.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Determining Factors that Influence Adoption of New Post-Stroke Sensorimotor Rehabilitation Devices in the USA.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Abbas OrandDepartment of Intelligent Systems and Digital Design, School of Information Technology, Halmstad University, Spetsvinkelgatan 29, 30250 Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6525-7665
Eren Erdal AksoyDepartment of Intelligent Systems and Digital Design, School of Information Technology, Halmstad University, Spetsvinkelgatan 29, 30250 Halmstad, Sweden.
Hiroyuki MiyasakaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Fujita Health University Nanakuri Memorial Hospital, 424-1 Oodori-cho, Tsu, Mie 514-1296, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9858-5809
Carolyn Weeks LevySchools of Mechatronics Systems Engineering and Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, 250-13450 102 Avenue, Surrey, BC V3T 0A3, Canada.
Xin ZhangSchools of Mechatronics Systems Engineering and Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, 250-13450 102 Avenue, Surrey, BC V3T 0A3, Canada.
Carlo MenonSchools of Mechatronics Systems Engineering and Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, 250-13450 102 Avenue, Surrey, BC V3T 0A3, Canada. cmenon@sfu.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2309-9977
Simon Fraser University · CAHalmstad University · SEFujita Health University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rehabilitation and mobility training of post-stroke patients is crucial for their functional recovery. While traditional methods can still help patients, new rehabilitation and mobility training methods are necessary to facilitate better recovery at lower costs. In this work, our objective was to design and develop a rehabilitation training system targeting the functional recovery of post-stroke users with high efficiency. To accomplish this goal, we applied a bilateral training method, which proved to be effective in enhancing motor recovery using tactile feedback for the training. One participant with hemiparesis underwent six weeks of training. Two protocols, "contralateral arm matching" and "both arms moving together", were carried out by the participant. Each of the protocols consisted of "shoulder abduction" and "shoulder flexion" at angles close to 30 and 60 degrees. The participant carried out 15 repetitions at each angle for each task. For example, in the "contralateral arm matching" protocol, the unaffected arm of the participant was set to an angle close to 30 degrees. He was then requested to keep the unaffected arm at the specified angle while trying to match the position with the affected arm. Whenever the two arms matched, a vibration was given on both brachialis muscles. For the "both arms moving together" protocol, the two arms were first set approximately to an angle of either 30 or 60 degrees. The participant was asked to return both arms to a relaxed position before moving both arms back to the remembered specified angle. The arm that was slower in moving to the specified angle received a vibration. We performed clinical assessments before, midway through, and after the training period using a Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), a Wolf motor function test (WMFT), and a proprioceptive assessment. For the assessments, two ipsilateral and contralateral arm matching tasks, each consisting of three movements (shoulder abduction, shoulder flexion, and elbow flexion), were used. Movements were performed at two angles, 30 and 60 degrees. For both tasks, the same procedure was used. For example, in the case of the ipsilateral arm matching task, an experimenter positioned the affected arm of the participant at 30 degrees of shoulder abduction. The participant was requested to keep the arm in that position for ~5 s before returning to a relaxed initial position. Then, after another ~5-s delay, the participant moved the affected arm back to the remembered position. An experimenter measured this shoulder abduction angle manually using a goniometer. The same procedure was repeated for the 60 degree angle and for the other two movements. We applied a low-cost Kinect to extract the participant's body joint position data. Tactile feedback was given based on the arm position detected by the Kinect sensor. By using a Kinect sensor, we demonstrated the feasibility of the system for the training of a post-stroke user. The proposed system can further be employed for self-training of patients at home. The results of the FMA, WMFT, and goniometer angle measurements showed improvements in several tasks, suggesting a positive effect of the training system and its feasibility for further application for stroke survivors' rehabilitation.

Indexed as

AgedBiomechanical PhenomenaElbow JointHumansMaleParesisRecovery of FunctionShoulderStrokeStroke RehabilitationSurvivorsbilateral trainingKinectstroke rehabilitationtactile feedback

Identifiers

PMID31398957
PMCPMC6719092
OpenAlexW2968774000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.