Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31398887›Full record

ArticleVaccines2019

A Qualitative Study on Gendered Barriers to Livestock Vaccine Uptake in Kenya and Uganda and Their Implications on Rift Valley Fever Control.

Edna Mutua, Nicoline de Haan, Dan Tumusiime, Christine Jost, Bernard Bett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rift Valley fever and invisible women.Research directions. One health · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Edna MutuaInternational Livestock Research Institute, Post Office Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. ednamutua@gmail.com.
Nicoline de HaanInternational Livestock Research Institute, Post Office Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
Dan TumusiimeMinistry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, Post Office Box 102, Plot 16-18 Lugard Avenue, Entebbe, Uganda.
Christine JostGlobal Health Support Initiative III, Social Solutions International, United States Agency for International Development Office of US Foreign Disaster Assistance, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave North West, Washington, DC 20523, USA.
Bernard BettInternational Livestock Research Institute, Post Office Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
International Livestock Research Institute · KEMinistry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries · UGUnited States Agency for International Development · US

Funding

USAID Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance; Additional support was obtained from the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health led by IFPRI. CRP21-OA3-2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a zoonotic disease of great public health and economic importance transmitted by mosquitoes. The main method of preventing the disease is vaccination of susceptible livestock before outbreaks occur. Studies on RVF vaccines have focused on the production processes, safety, and efficacy standards but those on uptake and adoption levels are rare. This study sought to understand the barriers faced by men and women farmers in the uptake of livestock vaccines to inform strategies for optimizing the use of vaccines against RVF in East Africa. The cross-sectional qualitative study utilized the pairwise ranking technique in sex disaggregated focus group discussions to identify and rank these barriers. Results indicate that men and women farmers experience barriers to vaccine uptake differentially. The barriers include the direct and indirect cost of vaccines, distances to vaccination points, availability of vaccination crushes, intra-household decision making processes and availability of information on vaccination campaigns. The study concludes that vaccine provision does not guarantee uptake at the community level. Hence, these barriers should be considered while designing vaccination strategies to enhance community uptake because vaccine uptake is a complex process which requires buy-in from men and women farmers, veterinary departments, county/district and national governments, and vaccine producers.

Indexed as

barriersgenderKenyalivestockrift valley feverUgandauptakevaccines

Identifiers

PMID31398887
PMCPMC6789819
OpenAlexW2968224097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.