ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019
Repeatability of Intraoral Scanners for Complete Arch Scan of Partially Edentulous Dentitions: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Accuracy assessment of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by selective laser melting using two different workflows: A cross-over clinical study.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Article
- Evaluation of Ultra-Low-Dose CBCT Protocols to Investigate Vestibular Bone Defects in the Context of Immediate Implant Planning: An Ex Vivo Study on Cadaver Skulls.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- In-vitro validation of a new method to assess the clinical accuracy of complete arch impressions.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Article
- An In Vivo Comparison of Trueness and Precision of Two Novel Methods for Improving Edentulous Full Arch Implant Scanning Accuracy: A Pilot Study.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Scanning Strategy on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners : In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Scanning Strategy on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners.Galen medical journal · 2024Article
- Accuracy of Computerized Optical Impression Making in Fabrication of Removable Dentures for Partially Edentulous Jaws: An In Vivo Feasibility Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Intraoral scanning of the edentulous jaw without additional markers: AnImaging science in dentistry · 2023Article
- [Research progress of digital occlusion setup in orthognathic surgery].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023Review
- Effect of Scanning Origin Location on Data Accuracy of Abutment Teeth Region in Digital Impression Acquired Using Intraoral Scanner for Removable Partial Denture: A Preliminary In Vitro Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The Effect of Scanning Strategy on Intraoral Scanner's Accuracy.Dentistry journal · 2022Article
- Accuracy of full-arch digitalization for partially edentulous jaws - a laboratory study on basis of coordinate-based data analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Quantitative and qualitative evaluation on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for human identification in forensic odontology.Anatomy & cell biology · 2022Article
- A digital method for wear volume loss analysis using a single-scan three-dimensional dataset.Journal of dental sciences · 2022Article
- Trueness of digital implant impressions based on implant angulation and scan body materials.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Use of Intraoral Scanners for Full Dental Arches: Could Different Strategies or Overlapping Software Affect Accuracy?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- A Comparison of Full Arch Trueness and Precision of Nine Intra-Oral Digital Scanners and Four Lab Digital Scanners.Dentistry journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Research on whether the number or location of missing teeth affects the accuracy of intraoral scanners in partial edentulous patients is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the precision of complete-arch scan data of various partial edentulous arches acquired by intraoral scanners. Five different maxillary models were scanned using Carestream CS3600 and Medit i500 scanners. The models employed here were control: Fully dentate; Case 1: Missing a right second premolar and a first molar; Case 2: Missing a right second premolar, a first molar, both left premolars, and a left first molar; Case 3: Missing four incisors and a right canine; and Case 4: Missing four incisors, a left second premolar, and a first molar. Six scans per group were performed and the resulting two datasets were paired to analyze the precision of each group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.