Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31398772›Full record

SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

Socio-economic differences in patient participation behaviours in doctor-patient interactions-A systematic mapping review of the literature.

Sarah Allen, Simon N Rogers, Rebecca V Harris

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Socio-economic differences in patient participation behaviours in doctor-patient interactions-A systematic mapping review of the literature.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: main results of a cluster preference randomised controlled trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What are the underlying reasons behind socioeconomic differences in doctor-patient communication in head and neck oncology review clinics?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Digital Health Use Across Socioeconomic Groups Among Patients With Chronic Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah AllenDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1194-3584
Simon N RogersEvidence-Based Practice Research Centre (EPRC), Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Rebecca V HarrisDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Department of HealthNational Institute for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe degree to which patients participate in their care can have a positive impact on health outcomes. This review aimed to map the current literature on patient participation behaviours in interactions with physicians and the extent to which differences in these behaviours can be explained by socio-economic status (SES). SEARCH STRATEGY: Four electronic databases were searched from 1980 onwards using key words related to socio-economic status and patient participation behaviours. STUDY SELECTION: Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened by two reviewers, with the second reviewer screening 20% of all entries. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on year of publication, country, patient population, setting, patient participation behaviour studied, and SES measure used were extracted. MAIN

resultsForty-nine studies were included in the review. Most studies were conducted in the United States, and the most commonly studied patient participation behaviour was involvement in decision making. Most studies measured SES using education as an indicator, with very few studies using occupation as a measure. Many studies did not report on participants' medical condition or study setting. Patient participation in their health-care appointment increased with increasing SES in 24 studies, although in 27 studies no significant association was found. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsCurrent literature was found to be mainly US-centric. Many studies did not specify participants' medical condition or in what setting the study was undertaken. More studies are needed on less commonly studied patient participation behaviours. It would be helpful for further studies to also include a wider range of SES indicators.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsSocioeconomic FactorsHumanscommunicationDoctor-patient relationshipinequalitiespatient participationsocio-economic status

Identifiers

PMID31398772
PMCPMC6803421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.