Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31398281›Full record

ArticleCancer cytopathology2019

CytoLyt fixation significantly inhibits MIB1 immunoreactivity whereas alternative Ki-67 clone 30-9 is not susceptible to the inhibition: Critical diagnostic implications.

Darren J Buonocore, Fumiko Konno, Achim A Jungbluth, Denise Frosina, Mariam Fayad, Marcia Edelweiss, Oscar Lin, Natasha Rekhtman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cytopathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lung neuroendocrine neoplasms: recent progress and persistent challenges.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Darren J BuonocoreDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2035-8440
Fumiko KonnoDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Achim A JungbluthDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Denise FrosinaDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Mariam FayadDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Marcia EdelweissDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-6288-5244
Oscar LinDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2089-6118
Natasha RekhtmanDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Ki-67 proliferation marker has multiple diagnostic and prognostic applications. Although several clones to the Ki-67 antigen are commercially available, the MIB1 clone is widely recommended in the surgical pathology literature for neuroendocrine tumors. In our cytopathology practice, we have encountered unexpectedly low MIB1 immunoreactivity in CytoLyt-fixed cell blocks (CBs). The current study evaluated the impact of fixatives, CB processing, and immunocytochemical (ICC) procedures on Ki-67 immunoreactivity.

methodsTest CBs were prepared from freshly resected tumors, and multiple variables in the MIB1 ICC procedure were tested, including CytoLyt versus formalin collection media, MIB1 versus other Ki-67 clones including 30-9, and other variables. MIB1 versus Ki-67 30-9 clones were tested in parallel on CytoLyt-fixed CBs from clinical samples of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC).

resultsIn the test CBs (n = 10), the mean MIB1 labeling index was 10% in CytoLyt versus 47% in formalin (P = .0116), with a mean loss of reactivity in matched CBs of 37% (up to 70%). None of the procedure modifications tested in 223 individual ICC reactions recovered MIB1 reactivity in CytoLyt except for switching to the Ki-67 30-9 antibody. In CytoLyt-fixed SCLC samples (n = 14), the Ki-67 30-9 antibody demonstrated expected ranges of reactivity (mean, 83%; range, 60%-100%), whereas MIB1 demonstrated markedly inhibited labeling (mean, 60%; range, 10%-95%) (P = .0058).

conclusionsCytoLyt fixation substantially inhibits MIB1 immunoreactivity, whereas the Ki-67 30-9 clone is not susceptible to inhibition. Markedly discrepant MIB1 reactivity may present a pitfall in the diagnosis of SCLC and may lead to the incorrect prognostic stratification of other tumor types. For laboratories using CytoLyt, we recommend using the Ki-67 30-9 antibody rather than the MIB1 antibody.

Indexed as

Antibodies, AntinuclearAntibodies, MonoclonalDiagnosis, DifferentialFormaldehydeHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenLung NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaTissue FixationAntibodies, AntinuclearAntibodies, MonoclonalFormaldehydeKi-67 AntigenMIB-1 antibodycytologyCytoLytKi-67MIB1small cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID31398281
PMCPMC8375359
OpenAlexW2967041685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.