Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31398200›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Risk profiling of soil-transmitted helminth infection and estimated number of infected people in South Asia: A systematic review and Bayesian geostatistical Analysis.

Ying-Si Lai, Patricia Biedermann, Akina Shrestha, Frédérique Chammartin, Natacha À Porta, Antonio Montresor, Nerges F Mistry, Jürg Utzinger, Penelope Vounatsou

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying-Si LaiSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Patricia BiedermannSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Akina ShresthaSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Frédérique ChammartinSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Natacha À PortaDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Antonio MontresorDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nerges F MistryFoundation for Medical Research, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Jürg UtzingerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Penelope VounatsouSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4904-5352

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn South Asia, hundreds of millions of people are infected with soil-transmitted helminths (Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm, and Trichuris trichiura). However, high-resolution risk profiles and the estimated number of people infected have yet to be determined. In turn, such information will assist control programs to identify priority areas for allocation of scarce resource for the control of soil-transmitted helminth infection. METHODOLOGY: We pursued a systematic review to identify prevalence surveys pertaining to soil-transmitted helminth infections in four mainland countries (i.e., Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Pakistan) of South Asia. PubMed and ISI Web of Science were searched from inception to April 25, 2019, without restriction of language, study design, and survey date. We utilized Bayesian geostatistical models to identify environmental and socioeconomic predictors, and to estimate infection risk at high spatial resolution across the study region. PRINCIPAL

findingsA total of 536, 490, and 410 georeferenced surveys were identified for A. lumbricoides, hookworm, and T. trichiura, respectively. We estimate that 361 million people (95% Bayesian credible interval (BCI) 331-395 million), approximately one-quarter of the South Asia population, was infected with at least one soil-transmitted helminth species in 2015. A. lumbricoides was the predominant species. Moderate to high prevalence (>20%) of any soil-transmitted helminth infection was predicted in the northeastern part and some northern areas of the study region, as well as the southern coastal areas of India. The annual treatment needs for the school-age population requiring preventive chemotherapy was estimated at 165 million doses (95% BCI: 146-185 million). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our risk maps provide an overview of the geographic distribution of soil-transmitted helminth infection in four mainland countries of South Asia and highlight the need for up-to-date surveys to accurately evaluate the disease burden in the region.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremAncylostomatoideaAnimalsAscariasisAscaris lumbricoidesAsiaBangladeshDatabases, FactualHelminthiasisHelminthsHookworm InfectionsHumansIndiaNepalPakistanPrevalenceSoil

Identifiers

PMID31398200
PMCPMC6709929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.