Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31398180›Full record

ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2019

Gastric Residual Volume Measurement in U.K. PICUs: A Survey of Practice.

Lyvonne N Tume, Barbara Arch, Kerry Woolfall, Lynne Latten, Elizabeth Deja, Louise Roper, Nazima Pathan, Helen Eccleson, Helen Hickey, Michaela Brown and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Not Routinely Measuring Gastric Residual Volume to Guide Enteral Feeding Versus Routine Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Children (GASTRIC-PICU).Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lyvonne N TumeChild Health, Faculty of Health & Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Barbara ArchMedicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool Institute of Child Health Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Kerry WoolfallDepartment of Health Services Research, MRC Hubs for Trials Methodology Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Lynne LattenDepartment of Dietetics, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth DejaDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Louise RoperDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Nazima PathanPaediatric Intensive Care, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Helen EcclesonMedicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool Institute of Child Health Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Helen HickeyMedicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool Institute of Child Health Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Michaela BrownMedicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool Institute of Child Health Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Anne BeisselNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon-Bron, France.
Izabela AndrzejewskaNeonatal Unit/Neonatal, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Chris GaleNeonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital campus, London, United Kingdom.
Frédéric V VallaPediatric Intensive Care Unit, CarMEN INSERM UMR 1060 Equipe INFOLIP, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon-Bron, France.
Jon DorlingDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
University of Liverpool · GBHôpital Femme Mère Enfant · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FR

Funding

Department of Health HTA/16/94/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite little evidence, the practice of routine measurement of gastric residual volume to guide both the initiation and delivery of enteral feeding in PICUs is widespread internationally. In light of increased scrutiny of the evidence surrounding this practice, and as part of a trial feasibility study, we aimed to determine enteral feeding and gastric residual volume measurement practices in U.K. PICUs.

designAn online survey to 27 U.K. PICUs.

settingU.K. PICUs. SUBJECTS: A clinical nurse, senior doctor, and dietician were invited to collaboratively complete one survey per PICU and send a copy of their unit guidelines on enteral feeding and gastric residual volume.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN

resultsTwenty-four of 27 units (89%) approached completed the survey. Twenty-three units (95.8%; 23/24) had written feeding guidelines, and 19 units (19/23; 83%) sent their guidelines for review. More units fed continuously (15/24; 62%) than intermittently (9/24; 37%) via the gastric route as their primary feeding method. All but one PICU routinely measured gastric residual volume, regardless of the method of feeding. Eighteen units had an agreed definition of feed tolerance, and all these included gastric residual volume. Gastric residual volume thresholds for feed tolerance were either volume based (mL/kg body weight) (11/21; 52%) or a percentage of the volume of feed administered (6/21; 29%). Yet only a third of units provided guidance about the technique of gastric residual volume measurement.

conclusionsRoutine gastric residual volume measurement is part of standard practice in U.K. PICUs, with little guidance provided about the technique which may impact the accuracy of gastric residual volume. All PICUs that defined feed tolerance included gastric residual volume in the definition. This is important to know when proposing a standard practice arm of any future trial of no-routine gastric residual volume measurement in critically ill children.

Indexed as

Gastric EmptyingPractice Guidelines as TopicCritical CareEnteral NutritionFeasibility StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, PediatricSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID31398180
PMCPMC6692165
OpenAlexW2932897904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.