SynthesisJAMA network open2019
Cardiovascular Adverse Events Associated With BRAF and MEK Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
114 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brazilian Cardio-oncology Guideline - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020Guideline
- The type II RAF inhibitor tovorafenib in relapsed/refractory pediatric low-grade glioma: the phase 2 FIREFLY-1 trial.Nature medicine · 2024Trial
- Cardiovascular Implications of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibition Among Adolescents/Young Adults in ECOG-ACRIN E2805.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2023Trial
- Clinical spectrum and mechanistic insights into cardiotoxicity from cancer therapies.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- MicroRNAs and Alarmins in Cardio-Oncology: Biomarkers and Therapeutic Implications in Skin and Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cardiac Monitoring for Patients Undergoing Treatment With MEK Inhibitor Monotherapy.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Review
- The MEK inhibitor trametinib incurs mitochondrial injury and induces innate immune responses in the mouse heart.Science advances · 2026Article
- Venous thromboembolism and bleeding in advanced melanoma: a propensity-matched cohort analysis comparing first-line immunotherapy and targeted therapy.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Article
- Standardizing the Clinical Approach to Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction: Applying Cardio-Oncology Guidelines as a Practical Tool for Hematology and Oncology Providers.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical efficacy and cardiac toxicity associated with first-line dabrafenib plus trametinib in advanced BRAF V600_K601delinsE-mutated lung adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- New Standards in the Treatment of Advanced Metastatic Melanoma: Immunotherapy and BRAF-Targeted Therapies as Emerging Paradigms.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Treatment of left ventricular dysfunction during cancer therapy: a comprehensive review.Drugs in context · 2026Review
- Vascular malformations: from genetics to therapeutics.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in the diagnosis and management of pediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis and Rosai-Dorfman disease: therapies, biomarkers, and response assessment.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular Surveillance in BRAF/MEK Inhibitor Therapy: Early Lessons from Prospective Data.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
- Prospective Evaluation of the Cardiovascular Effects of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Patients With Melanoma.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
- Case report of LVEF derived from gated FDG-PET: potential to streamline cardiotoxic surveillance in melanoma patients.Melanoma management · 2025Article
54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) after treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in patients with melanoma remain incompletely characterized. Objective: To determine the association of BRAF and MEK inhibitor treatment with CVAEs in patients with melanoma compared with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Data Sources: PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science were systematically searched for keywords vemurafenib, dabrafenib, encorafenib, trametinib, binimetinib, and cobinimetinib from database inception through November 30, 2018. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials reporting on CVAEs in patients with melanoma being treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors compared with patients with melanoma being treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy were selected. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data assessment followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were determined using random-effects and fixed-effects analyses. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess study-level characteristics associated with CVAEs. Main Outcomes and Measures: The selected end points were pulmonary embolism, a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction, arterial hypertension, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and QTc interval prolongation. All-grade and high-grade (≥3) CVAEs were recorded. Results: Overall, 5 randomized clinical trials including 2317 patients with melanoma were selected. Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism (RR, 4.36; 95% CI, 1.23-15.44; P = .02), a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (RR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.74-7.94; P < .001), and arterial hypertension (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.12-1.97; P = .005) compared with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. The RRs for myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and QTc prolongation were similar between the groups. These results were consistent when assessing high-grade CVAEs (left ventricular ejection fraction: RR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.36-5.73; P = .005; I2 = 29%; high-grade arterial hypertension: RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.14-2.08; P = .005; I2 = 0%), but RRs for high-grade pulmonary embolism were similar between groups. A higher risk of a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with patients with a mean age younger than 55 years (RR, 26.50; 95% CI, 3.58-196.10; P = .001), and the associated risk of pulmonary embolism was higher for patients with a mean follow-up time longer than 15 months (RR, 7.70; 95% CI, 1.40-42.12; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: Therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was associated with a higher risk of CVAEs compared with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. The findings may help to balance between beneficial melanoma treatment and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.