Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31397690›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cardiology2019

Type A aortic dissection complicated by malperfusion syndrome.

Elizabeth L Norton, Minhaj S Khaja, David M Williams, Bo Yang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fate of Residual Aorta After Surgery for Type A Aortic Dissection.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth L NortonCreighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska.
Minhaj S KhajaDepartment of Radiology.
David M WilliamsDepartment of Radiology.
Bo YangDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Creighton University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Define the mechanisms of aortopathy in bicuspid aortic valve patientsR01HL141891 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI YANG, BO · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Effect of mutations in the TGF-beta pathway genes on smooth muscle cell differentiation using patient derived iPSCs.K08HL130614 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI YANG, BO · 2016 to 2020
$848k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL130614NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMalperfusion is present in up to 40% of acute type A aortic dissections (ATAADs) and results in increased morbidity and mortality. This review presents different management strategies in patients with ATAAD and malperfusion to improve outcomes. RECENT

findingsWhile the ideal management strategy of ATAAD complicated by malperfusion has yet to be determined, the literature provides evidence for additional techniques to be used in conjunction with central aortic repair to reduce mortality. SUMMARY: Recent findings support a role for initial reperfusion and delayed central aortic repair, although optimal management strategy remains debated.

Indexed as

Aortic AneurysmAortic DissectionHumansIschemiaReperfusion

Identifiers

PMID31397690
PMCPMC7141757
OpenAlexW2968926614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.