Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31397675›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)

Choroidal Hyperreflective Foci: A Novel Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarker in Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema.

Rupak Roy, Kumar Saurabh, Dhaivat Shah, Maitreyi Chowdhury, Sugandha Goel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Hyperreflective Choroidal Foci: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Choroidal Hyper-Reflective Foci in Geographic Atrophy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Hyperreflective foci in the choroid of normal eyes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rupak RoyRetina Services, Aditya Birla Sankara Nethralaya, Mukundapur, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Kumar SaurabhRetina Services, Kamalnayan Bajaj Sankara Nethralaya, New Town, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Dhaivat ShahRetina Services, Aditya Birla Sankara Nethralaya, Mukundapur, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Maitreyi ChowdhuryRetina Services, Aditya Birla Sankara Nethralaya, Mukundapur, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Sugandha GoelRetina Services, Aditya Birla Sankara Nethralaya, Mukundapur, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to examine the hyperreflective dots seen in choroid on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) and correlate it with visual acuity.

designConsecutive, cross-sectional case series of patients with DME between January 2017 and December 2017.

methodsEyes with DME having central foveal thickness ≥250 μm were included. SDOCT was performed using Spectralis system (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). Hyperreflective choroidal foci (HCF) were defined as well-circumscribed dots within choroid having reflectivity equal to or higher than adjacent retinal pigment epithelium. HCF were counted manually within 1500 μm of fovea using a horizontal line scan by a blinded observer. Eyes were divided in 3 groups: group A (no HCF), group B (1-10 HCF), and group C (>10 HCF).

resultsOne hundred nineteen eyes of 60 DME patients were included. Sixty (50.4%) eyes were in group A, whereas 42 (33.6%) and 17 (14.2%) eyes belonged to group B and group C, respectively. The mean logMAR best corrected visual acuity was significantly lower in group B (0.76 ± 0.79) and C (1.2 ± 0.78) as compared with group A (0.22 ± 0.49) (P = 0.001). Mean central foveal thickness in group A (300.4 ± 122.4 μm) was significantly lower than group B (455.52 ± 209.1 μm) and group C (529.4 ± 196.4 μm) with P value of 0.001.

conclusionsThe present study describes HCF as novel prognostic SDOCT biomarker in DME whose presence denotes poor visual acuity. Further longitudinal studies are required to substantiate our findings.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityChoroidCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetic RetinopathyFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetinal Pigment EpitheliumRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID31397675
PMCPMC6727920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.