Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31397551›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN2020

Attentional bias modification is associated with fMRI response toward negative stimuli in individuals with residual depression: a randomized controlled trial

Eva Hilland, Nils I. Landrø, Catherine J. Harmer, Michael Browning, Luigi A. Maglanoc, Rune Jonassen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02931487 (Restoring Emotion Regulation Networks in Depression Vulnerability), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02931487 nacompletednot on this map

Restoring Emotion Regulation Networks in Depression Vulnerability: An Experimental Study Applying an Attention Bias Modification Procedure

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OsloRan2015 to 2016Enrolled134ConditionsMajor DepressionArmsAttentional Bias Modification, Sham Comparator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Decoding and modifying dynamic attentional bias in gaming disorder.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Functional MRI in major depressive disorder: A review of findings, limitations, and future prospects.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva HillandFrom the Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Hilland, Landrø, Harmer, Maglanoc, Jonassen); the Division of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Hilland, Landrø); the Psychopharmacology and Emotional Research Lab, University Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Computational Psychiatry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Browning); the Oxford Health NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom (Browning); the NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Maglanoc); and the Division of Psychiatry, Akerhus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Jonassen).
Nils I. LandrøFrom the Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Hilland, Landrø, Harmer, Maglanoc, Jonassen); the Division of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Hilland, Landrø); the Psychopharmacology and Emotional Research Lab, University Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Computational Psychiatry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Browning); the Oxford Health NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom (Browning); the NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Maglanoc); and the Division of Psychiatry, Akerhus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Jonassen).
Catherine J. HarmerFrom the Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Hilland, Landrø, Harmer, Maglanoc, Jonassen); the Division of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Hilland, Landrø); the Psychopharmacology and Emotional Research Lab, University Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Computational Psychiatry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Browning); the Oxford Health NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom (Browning); the NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Maglanoc); and the Division of Psychiatry, Akerhus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Jonassen).
Michael BrowningFrom the Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Hilland, Landrø, Harmer, Maglanoc, Jonassen); the Division of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Hilland, Landrø); the Psychopharmacology and Emotional Research Lab, University Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Computational Psychiatry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Browning); the Oxford Health NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom (Browning); the NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Maglanoc); and the Division of Psychiatry, Akerhus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Jonassen).
Luigi A. MaglanocFrom the Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Hilland, Landrø, Harmer, Maglanoc, Jonassen); the Division of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Hilland, Landrø); the Psychopharmacology and Emotional Research Lab, University Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Computational Psychiatry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Browning); the Oxford Health NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom (Browning); the NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Maglanoc); and the Division of Psychiatry, Akerhus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Jonassen).
Rune JonassenFrom the Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Hilland, Landrø, Harmer, Maglanoc, Jonassen); the Division of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Hilland, Landrø); the Psychopharmacology and Emotional Research Lab, University Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Computational Psychiatry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Browning); the Oxford Health NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom (Browning); the NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (Maglanoc); and the Division of Psychiatry, Akerhus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Jonassen).
University of Oxford · GBDiakonhjemmet Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N008103/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Attentional bias modification (ABM) may lead to more adaptive emotion perception and emotion regulation. Understanding the neural basis of these effects may lead to greater precision for the development of future treatments. Task-related functional MRI (fMRI) after ABM training has not been investigated in depression so far. The main aim of this randomized controlled trial was to explore differences in brain activity after ABM training, in response to emotional stimuli. Methods: A total of 134 people with previous depression, who had been treated for depression and had various degrees of residual symptoms, were randomized to 14 days of active ABM or a closely matched placebo training, followed by an fMRI emotion regulation task. The training procedure was a classical dot–probe task with emotional face stimuli. In the active ABM condition, the probes replaced the more positively valenced face of a given pair. As participants implicitly learned to predict the probe location, this would be likely to induce a more positive attentional bias. The placebo condition was identical, except for the contingency of the probe, which appeared equally behind positive and negative stimuli. We compared depression symptoms and subjective ratings of perceived negativity during fMRI between the training groups. We explored brain activation in predefined regions of interest and across the whole brain. We explored activation in areas associated with changes in attentional bias and degree of depression. Results: Compared with the placebo group, the ABM group showed reduced activation in the amygdala and the anterior cingulate cortex when passively viewing negative images. We found no group differences in predefined regions of interest associated with emotion regulation strategies. Response in the temporal cortices was associated with the degree of change in attentional bias and the degree of depressive symptoms in ABM versus placebo. Limitations: These findings should be replicated in other samples of patients with depression, and in studies using fMRI designs that allow analyses of within-group variability from baseline to follow-up. Conclusion: Attentional bias modification training has an effect on brain function in the circuitry associated with emotional appraisal and the generation of affective states. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02931487

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAdultAffectAmygdalaAttentional BiasEmotional RegulationFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, VisualRemission InductionTherapy, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID31397551
PMCPMC6919922
OpenAlexW2981047585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.