Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31397353›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2019

Differentiating between Alzheimer's disease, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and normal aging

Guo-Ping Song, Ting-Ting Yao, Dan Wang, Yue-Hua Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. MR Biomarkers of Degenerative Brain Disorders Derived From Diffusion Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guo-Ping SongInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ting-Ting YaoInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Dan WangInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yue-Hua LiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion kurtosis imaging can be used to assess pathophysiological changes in tissue structure and to diagnose central nervous system diseases. However, its sensitivity in assessing hippocampal differences between patients with Alzheimer's disease and those with amnestic mild cognitive impairment has not been characterized. Here, we examined 20 individuals with Alzheimer's disease (11 men and 9 women, mean 73.2 ± 4.49 years), 20 with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (10 men and 10 women, mean 71.55 ± 4.77 years), and 20 normal controls (11 men and 9 women, mean 70.45 ± 5.04 years). We conducted diffusion kurtosis imaging, using a 3.0 T magnetic resonance scanner, to compare hippocampal differences among the three groups. The results demonstrated that the right hippocampal volume and bilateral mean kurtosis were remarkably smaller in individuals with Alzheimer's disease compared with those with amnestic mild cognitive impairment and normal controls. Further, the mean kurtosis was lower in the amnestic mild cognitive impairment group compared with the normal control group. The mean diffusion in the left hippocampus was lower in the Alzheimer's disease group than in the amnestic mild cognitive impairment and normal control groups, while the mean diffusion in the right hippocampus was lower in the Alzheimer's disease group than in the normal control group. Fractional anisotropy was similar among the three groups. These results verify that bilateral mean kurtosis and mean diffusion are sensitive to the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China on May 4, 2010 (approval No. 2010(C)-6).

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseamnestic mild cognitive impairmentdiffusion kurtosis imagingfractional anisotropyhippocampusmagnetic resonance imagingmean diffusionmean kurtosisnerve regenerationneural regeneration

Identifiers

PMID31397353
PMCPMC6788254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.