Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31396834›Full record

Trial reportClinical rheumatology2019

Safety of adalimumab biosimilar MSB11022 (acetate-buffered formulation) in patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis.

Christopher J Edwards, Joëlle Monnet, Martin Ullmann, Pantelis Vlachos, Veranika Chyrok, Vishal Ghori

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03052322 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of MSB11022 Compared With Humira® in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03052322 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of MSB11022 Compared With Humira® in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorFresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbHRan2017 to 2018Enrolled288ConditionsModerate to Severe Rheumatoid ArthritisArmsMSB11022, EU-Humira
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher J EdwardsNIHR Clinical Research Facility, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. cedwards@soton.ac.uk.
Joëlle MonnetFresenius Kabi, Eysins, Switzerland.
Martin UllmannFresenius Kabi, Eysins, Switzerland.
Pantelis VlachosCytel, Geneva, Switzerland.
Veranika ChyrokFresenius Kabi, Eysins, Switzerland.
Vishal GhoriFresenius Kabi, Eysins, Switzerland.
University of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of MSB11022 (acetate-buffered formulation), an adalimumab biosimilar, with the reference product.

methodAURIEL-RA study was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial (NCT03052322). Patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate were randomized 1:1 to MSB11022 or reference adalimumab. The primary endpoint was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events of special interest (AESIs) (predefined as hypersensitivity) up to week 52. The key secondary endpoint was ACR20 (≥ 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology core set measurements from baseline) at week 12. Other efficacy endpoints, quality of life, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated up to week 52. Secondary safety endpoints were evaluated up to week 52 and at a 4-month safety follow-up.

resultsIn total, 288 patients were randomized. The proportion of patients experiencing ≥ 1 treatment-emergent AESI up to week 52 was similar between trial arms: 6 patients (4.2%; 95% CI 1.56, 8.91) receiving MSB11022, and 8 patients (5.5%; 95% CI 2.41, 10.58) receiving reference adalimumab. No clinically meaningful differences in efficacy, quality of life, or immunogenicity were seen between treatment arms up to week 52. No notable difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was observed between treatment arms up to the end of the follow-up period.

conclusionsThese results suggest MSB11022 and reference adalimumab are similar in patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis in terms of safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy. AURIEL-RA provides evidence to support the similarity of MSB11022 and adalimumab.Key Points• Incidences of hypersensitivity events were similar for MSB11022 (modified buffer) and reference adalimumab.• There was no difference in local reactions between MSB11022 (modified buffer) and reference adalimumab.• AURIEL-RA confirms the equivalence in efficacy and immunogenicity of MSB11022 (modified buffer) and reference adalimumab.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdalimumabAntirheumatic AgentsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsAdalimumabBiosimilarHypersensitivityMSB11022Rheumatoid arthritisTNF inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID31396834
OpenAlexW2967573860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.