Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31396830›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Organization and training at national level of antimicrobial stewardship and infection control activities in Europe: an ESCMID cross-sectional survey.

Alberto Enrico Maraolo, David S Y Ong, Cansu Cimen, Philip Howard, Diamantis P Kofteridis, Jeroen Schouten, Nico T Mutters, Céline Pulcini, ESGAP-EUCIC-TAE Working Group on AMS/IPC mapping in Europe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alberto Enrico MaraoloDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
David S Y OngDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Kleiweg 500, 3045 PM, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. davidsyong@gmail.com.
Cansu CimenInfectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Clinic, Ministry of Health, Ardahan Public Hospital, Ardahan, Turkey.
Philip HowardLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Diamantis P KofteridisFaculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Heraklion and University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Jeroen SchoutenScientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nico T MuttersInstitute for Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Céline PulciniAPEMAC and Infectious Diseases Department, Université de Lorraine and CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France.
ESGAP-EUCIC-TAE Working Group on AMS/IPC mapping in Europe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and Infection prevention and control (IPC) are two key complementary strategies that combat development and spread of antimicrobial resistance. The ESGAP (ESCMID Study Group for AMS), EUCIC (European Committee on Infection Control) and TAE (Trainee Association of ESCMID) investigated how AMS and IPC activities and training are organized, if present, at national level in Europe. From February 2018 to May 2018, an internet-based cross-sectional survey was conducted through a 36-item questionnaire, involving up to three selected respondents per country, from 38 European countries in total (including Israel), belonging to the ESGAP/EUCIC/TAE networks. All 38 countries participated with at least one respondent, and a total of 81 respondents. Education and involvement in AMS programmes were mandatory during the postgraduate training of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases specialists in up to one-third of countries. IPC was acknowledged as a specialty in 32% of countries. Only 32% of countries had both guidance and national requirements regarding AMS programmes, in contrast to 61% for IPC. Formal national staffing standards for AMS and IPC hospital-based activities were present in 24% and 63% of countries, respectively. The backgrounds of professionals responsible for AMS and IPC programmes varied tremendously between countries. The organization and training of AMS and IPC in Europe are heterogeneous and national requirements for activities are frequently lacking.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, ContinuingEuropeHospital AdministrationHumansInfection ControlInfection Control PractitionersMedical Laboratory PersonnelSurveys and QuestionnairesAntimicrobial stewardshipClinical microbiologyInfection prevention and controlInfectious diseasesQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID31396830
PMCPMC6800847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.