Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31396819›Full record

SynthesisJournal of behavioral medicine2020

Necessity and concerns beliefs and HIV medication adherence: a systematic review.

Luke D Mitzel, Peter A Vanable

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luke D MitzelDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA. ldmitzel@syr.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3894-9855
Peter A VanableDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the Necessity-Concerns Framework, beliefs about medication necessity and concerns are two core themes from diverse patient medication beliefs across chronic illnesses that may directly influence adherence. Past work has supported associations of necessity and concerns to adherence in the chronic disease literature and in HIV research. However, there has not been a focused review of the literature on associations of necessity and concerns to HIV medication adherence, nor on what variables may influence these associations. This systematic review synthesized findings from 26 studies regarding associations of necessity and concerns to HIV medication adherence. Both beliefs showed small, clinically significant effects on adherence. A subset of studies identified perceptions of healthcare providers as determinants of necessity and concerns beliefs with indirect effects on adherence. Overall, necessity and concerns demonstrated clinically significant associations to adherence among people with HIV.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesConcernsHIVMedication adherenceMedication beliefsNecessity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.