SynthesisPsychonomic bulletin & review2019
Age-related differences in recall and recognition: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Depression and episodic memory across the adult lifespan: A meta-analytic review.Psychological bulletin · 2021Pooled it
- Incidental Learning: A Systematic Review of Its Effect on Episodic Memory Performance in Older Age.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2019Pooled it
- Knowledge-based intervention improves older adult recognition memory for novel activity, but not event segmentation or temporal order memory.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- The antimuscarinic agent biperiden selectively impairs recognition of abstract figures without affecting the processing of non-words.Human psychopharmacology · 2022Trial
- Proportions of fall-related and insufficiency-related vertebral fractures among hospitalized older patients.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Conceptual but not perceptual encoding leads to age differences in priming.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Are Creative People More Susceptible to False Memory? Evidence for Age- and Task-Related Differences.Creativity research journal · 2026Article
- One-year longitudinal cohort study of chemosensory recovery and plasma biomarker dynamics in SARS-CoV-2 survivors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Testing before learning: Exploring the robustness of the pretesting effect.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Cultural Engagement Is Related to Decelerated Physiological Age: Doubly Robust Estimations in a National Cohort Study.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Specialized recall procedures.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Modulation of fronto-parietal and autonomic activity underpins preserved working memory in middle-aged adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Early life experiences and adult orientation to promote good in 22 countries.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Flashbulb memories for the declaration of the COVID-19 alarm state: Age-related differences.Psychological research · 2025Article
- EEG Correlates of Auditory Short-Term Memory and Dissimilarity Perception in Young and Older Adults.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Neural biomarkers of age-related memory change.Psychology and aging · 2025Article
- Bilingual Proficiency Effects on Word Recall and Recognition.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Probing the origins of subjective confidence in source memory decisions in young and older adults: A sequential sampling account.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025Article
- Forgetting is comparable between healthy young and old people.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Correcting fake news headlines after repeated exposure: memory and belief accuracy in younger and older adults.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relative to younger adults, older adults tend to perform more poorly on tests of both free recall and item recognition memory. The age difference in performance is typically larger for recall tasks relative to those involving recognition. However, there have been reports of comparable age-related differences in free recall and item recognition performance. Further, a differential performance cost does not necessarily mean that processes involved in recall are specifically affected by age. Here we present a meta-analysis of 36 articles reporting 89 direct comparisons of free recall and item recognition in younger and older groups of participants. Standardized effect sizes reveal that age differences are larger for recall tasks (Hedges' g = 0.89, 95% confidence intervals [0.75, 1.03]) than for recognition tasks (0.54, [0.37, 0.72]). Further, Brinley analyses of the data suggest that distinct functions are needed to relate younger and older performance for the two tasks. These functions differ in intercept pointing to a disproportionate age difference in recall relative to recognition. This is in line with theories of memory and aging which posit specific deficits in processes related to search and retrieval from memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31396816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.