Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31396777›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear and Angular Measurements in Virtual Reality: a Validation Study.

Asif Ahmed Anik, Brian A Xavier, Jan Hansmann, Emmanuel Ansong, Jinsong Chen, Linping Zhao, Edward Michals

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Virtual Reality Planning for Mandible Reconstruction: A Case Report.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Extended reality for biomedicine.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Asif Ahmed AnikDepartment of Mechanical Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 842 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Brian A XavierDepartment of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, 1740 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Jan HansmannDepartment of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, 1740 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Emmanuel AnsongUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine, 1853 West Polk Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Jinsong ChenCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Linping ZhaoThe Craniofacial Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, 811 S. Paulina St., Chicago, IL60612, USA. lpzhao99@uic.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3429-2534
Edward MichalsDepartment of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, 1740 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this experimental study is to validate linear and angular measurements acquired in a virtual reality (VR) environment via a comparison with the physical measurements. The hypotheses tested are as follows: VR linear and angular measurements (1) are equivalent to the corresponding physical measurements and (2) achieve a high degree of reproducibility. Both virtual and physical measurements were performed by two raters in four different sessions. A total of 40 linear and 15 angular measurements were acquired from three physical objects (an L-block, a hand model, and a dry skull) via the use of fiducial markers on selected locations. After both intra- and inter-rater reliability were evaluated using inter-class coefficient (ICC), equivalence between virtual and physical measurements was analyzed via paired t test and Bland-Altman plots. The accuracy of the virtual measurements was further estimated using two one-sided tests (TOST) procedure. The reproducibility of virtual measurements was evaluated via ICC as well as the repeatability coefficient. Virtual reality measurements were equivalent to physical measurements as evidenced by a paired t test with p values of 0.413 for linear and 0.533 for angular measurements and Bland-Altman plots in all three objects. The accuracy of virtual measurements was estimated to be 0.5 mm for linear and 0.7° for angular measurements, respectively. Reproducibility in VR measurements was high as evidenced by ICC of 1.00 for linear and 0.99 for angular measurements, respectively. Both linear and angular measurements in the VR environment are equivalent to the physical measurements with high accuracy and reproducibility.

Indexed as

Virtual RealityHumansReproducibility of ResultsAccuracyEquivalenceMeasurementsReproducibilityValidationVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID31396777
PMCPMC7064653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.