Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31396735›Full record

SynthesisPediatric surgery international2019

Evaluation methods and impact of simulation-based training in pediatric surgery: a systematic review.

Shinichiro Yokoyama, Kenichi Mizunuma, Yo Kurashima, Yusuke Watanabe, Tomoko Mizota, Saseem Poudel, Takanori Kikuchi, Fujimi Kawai, Toshiaki Shichinohe, Satoshi Hirano

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shinichiro YokoyamaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Kenichi MizunumaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Yo KurashimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. yo.kurashima@huhp.hokudai.ac.jp.
Yusuke WatanabeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Tomoko MizotaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Saseem PoudelDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Takanori KikuchiMedical Library, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Fujimi KawaiSt. Luke's International University Library, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiaki ShichinoheDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Satoshi HiranoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to identify (1) the type of skill evaluation methods and (2) how the effect of training was evaluated in simulation-based training (SBT) in pediatric surgery.

methodsDatabases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for articles published from January 2000 to January 2017. Search concepts of Medical Subject Heading terms were "surgery," "pediatrics," "simulation," and "training, evaluation."

resultsOf 5858 publications identified, 43 were included. Twenty papers described simulators as assessment tools used to evaluate technical skills. Reviewers differentiated between experts and trainees using a scoring system (45%) and/or a checklist (25%). Simulators as training tools were described in 23 papers. While the training's effectiveness was measured using performance assessment scales (52%) and/or surveys (43%), no study investigated the improvement of the clinical outcomes after SBT.

conclusionScoring, time, and motion analysis methods were used for the evaluation of basic techniques of laparoscopic skills. Only a few SBT in pediatric surgery have definite goals with clinical effect. Future research needs to demonstrate the educational effect of simulators as assessment or training tools on SBT in pediatric surgery.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceComputer SimulationChildEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansLaparoscopySimulation TrainingCompetencyEvaluationSurgical educationTraining impact

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.