Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31396481›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2019

MRD in AML: The Role of New Techniques.

Maria Teresa Voso, Tiziana Ottone, Serena Lavorgna, Adriano Venditti, Luca Maurillo, Francesco Lo-Coco, Francesco Buccisano

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07060001 (Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hypomethylating Agent Versus Standard Intensive Chemotherapy Induction Based on 5hmC - a Novel, Blood Epigenetic Marker for Assessing Measurable Residual Disease in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07060001 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hypomethylating Agent Versus Standard Intensive Chemotherapy Induction Based on 5hmC - a Novel, Blood Epigenetic Marker for Assessing Measurable Residual Disease in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Methodist Hospital Research InstituteRan2026 to 2029Enrolled112ConditionsAcute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML)Arms5hmC Biomarker, Venetoclax, Decitabine 20 mg/m²/day for 5 days, Azacitidine (AZA), Cytarabine (Ara-C)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy in leukemias.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Old and New Concepts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Teresa VosoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Tiziana OttoneDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Serena LavorgnaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Adriano VendittiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Luca MaurilloDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Francesco Lo-CocoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Francesco BuccisanoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of precision medicine, assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) has been used in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to direct individual treatment programs, including allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients at high-risk of relapse. One of the limits of this approach has been in the past the paucity of AML markers suitable for MRD assessment. Recently, the number of biomarkers has increased, due to the identification of highly specific leukemia-associated immunophenotypes by multicolor flow-cytometry, and of rare mutated gene sequences by digital droplet PCR, or next-generation sequencing (NGS). In addition, NGS allowed unraveling of clonal heterogeneity, present in AML at initial diagnosis or developing during treatment, which influences reliability of specific biomarkers, that may be unstable during the disease course. The technological advances have increased the application of MRD-based strategies to a significantly higher number of AML patients, and the information deriving from MRD assessment has been used to design individual post-remission protocols and pre-emptive treatments in patients with sub-clinical relapse. This led to the definition of MRD-negative complete remission as outcome definition in the recently published European Leukemianet MRD guidelines. In this review, we summarized the principles of modern technologies and their clinical applications for MRD detection in AML patients, according to the specific leukemic markers.

Indexed as

AMLdigital droplet PCRMRDmultiparametric flow-cytometryNGS

Identifiers

PMID31396481
PMCPMC6664148
OpenAlexW2953765505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.