Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31396416›Full record

ReviewCritical care research and practice2019

Renal Replacement Therapy in the Critical Care Setting.

Adeel Rafi Ahmed, Ayanfeoluwa Obilana, David Lappin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care research and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05941624 (Comparison Between HA330 Hemoperfusion Filter Hemodialysis and Conventional High-Flux Filter Hemodialysis in Reducing Inflammatory Mediators in Renal Dysfunction Due to Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05941624 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between HA330 Hemoperfusion Filter Hemodialysis and Conventional High-Flux Filter Hemodialysis in Reducing Inflammatory Mediators in Renal Dysfunction Due to Sepsis

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled33ConditionsRenal Dysfunction, Sepsis, HemodialysisArmsHa-330 Hemoperfusion Filter Hemodialysis, Conventional Hemodialysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Overview of Renal Replacement Therapy Use in a General Intensive Care Unit.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Kidney injury in COVID-19.World journal of nephrology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adeel Rafi AhmedMB BCh BAO MRCPI MRCP(UK) PGDip (ClinEd), Holder of European Certificate in Nephrology, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5910-6980
Ayanfeoluwa ObilanaMB BCh BAO MRCPI, Specialist Registrar in Nephrology, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
David LappinMB BCh FRCPI PhD (NUI), Consultant Nephrologist, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
University Hospital Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is frequently required to manage critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). There is limited evidence to support the current practice of RRT in intensive care units (ICUs). Recently published randomized control trials (RCTs) have further questioned our understanding of RRT in critical care. The optimal timing and dosing continues to be debatable; however, current evidence suggests delayed strategy with less intensive dosing when utilising RRT. Various modes of RRT are complementary to each other with no definite benefits to mortality or renal function preservation. Choice of anticoagulation remains regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with lower bleeding risk when compared with heparin. RRT can be used to support resistant cardiac failure, but evolving therapies such as haemoperfusion are currently not recommended in sepsis.

Identifiers

PMID31396416
PMCPMC6664494
OpenAlexW2957945153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.