ArticleFungal biology and biotechnology2019
A closer look at
Article in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing microbioreactor cultivation strategies for Trichoderma reesei: from batch to fed-batch operations.Microbial cell factories · 2024Article
- Novel bioreactor internals for the cultivation of spore-forming fungi in pellet form.Engineering in life sciences · 2022Article
- A fully automated pipeline for the dynamic at-line morphology analysis of microscale Aspergillus cultivation.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Insights into the morphology-productivity relationship of filamentous fungi through small-scale cultivation and automated microscopy of Thermothelomyces thermophilus.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFilamentously growing microorganisms offer unique advantages for biotechnological processes, such as extraordinary secretion capacities, going along with multiple obstacles due to their complex morphology. However, limited experimental throughput in bioprocess development still hampers taking advantage of their full potential. Miniaturization and automation are powerful tools to accelerate bioprocess development, but so far the application of such technologies has mainly been focused on non-filamentous systems. During cultivation, filamentous fungi can undergo remarkable morphological changes, creating challenging cultivation conditions. Depending on the process and product, only one specific state of morphology may be advantageous to achieve e.g. optimal productivity or yield. Different approaches to control morphology have been investigated, such as microparticle enhanced cultivation. However, the addition of solid microparticles impedes the optical measurements typically used by microbioreactor systems and thus alternatives are needed.
results
conclusionA robust workflow for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.