ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2019
Evaluation of the 5-fluorouracil plasma level in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing continuous infusion chemotherapy.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasma 5-Fluorouracil Exposure, Clinical Outcomes, and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Prothrombotic Tendency in the Shadow of Cancer: Hypercoagulability, Impaired Clot Contraction and Fibrinolysis in Colorectal Cancer and Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Quercetin and 5-Fluorouracil Synergistically Suppress ZEB1 and Restore Epithelial Integrity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Iranian biomedical journal · 2026Article
- A Phase I Clinical Trial of Intrahepatic Artery Delivery of TG6002 in Combination with Oral 5-Fluorocytosine in Patients with Liver-Dominant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Article
- Development of an Early-Warning Model for Predicting the Capecitabine-Induced Diarrhea.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- 5-Fluorouracil treatment represses pseudouridine-containing miRNA export into extracellular vesicles.Journal of extracellular biology · 2024Article
- The Salmon Oil OmeGo Reduces Viability of Colorectal Cancer Cells and Potentiates the Anti-Cancer Effect of 5-FU.Marine drugs · 2023Article
- 3D-Printed Tumor-on-Chip for the Culture of Colorectal Cancer Microspheres: Mass Transport Characterization and Anti-Cancer Drug Assays.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The cancer chemotherapeutic 5-fluorouracil is a potent Fusobacterium nucleatum inhibitor and its activity is modified by intratumoral microbiota.Cell reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) dosing has traditionally been based on the body surface area (BSA) in colorectal cancer treatment. However, there is accumulating evidence that dosing based on BSA may be of limited use. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the changes in 5-FU plasma levels and tumor response as well as the severity of adverse events in patients with cancer treated with 5-FU combined chemotherapy. The dosing amount of 5-FU was determined based on the BSA. Blood samples were collected, and 5-FU plasma levels in 15 patients with colorectal cancer were measured three times (0, 22 and 40 h before and after the start of infusion) during constant-infusion of 5-FU for 46 h by an immunoassay. 5-FU plasma levels were significantly higher at 22 and 40 h compared with at 0 h (P<0.001), when all 15 patients were analyzed. Notably, the tumor response of the partial response/stable disease group showed significant increases in 5-FU plasma levels at 40 h compared with at 22 h (P<0.01), while the progressive disease group showed no significant increase. In addition, the 5-FU plasma level in the adverse event level of grade ≥2 was higher than that of grade <2 at 40 h after the start of infusion. Collectively, these observations indicated that during continuous infusion of 5-FU, the 5-FU plasma level increased significantly, and the tumor response (such as partial response, stable or progressive disease) may be influenced by the increase of 5-FU plasma level from the start of infusion. Therefore, the 5-FU plasma level may be a predictive factor for maximizing the tumor response and minimizing the risk of severe adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.