ArticleWorld journal of radiology2019
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging appearance of benign and classic "do not touch" osseous lesions.
Article in World journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Doughnut-shaped bone lesions onAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Current Position of Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Primary Bone Tumors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Cross-sectional evaluation of FGD-avid polyostotic fibrous dysplasia: MRI, CT and PET/MRI findings.European journal of hybrid imaging · 2022Article
- Paget Disease as Common Pitfall on PET with Different Radiopharmaceuticals in Oncology: Not All That Glitters Is Gold!Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Multidisciplinary management of spinal metastases: what the radiologist needs to know.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Differentiation of soft tissue and bone sarcomas from benign lesions utilizingBMC medical imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClassic "do not touch" and benign osseous lesions are sometimes detected on
aimTo show that "do not touch" and benign osseous lesions can have increased
methodsThis retrospective study evaluated 287 independent patients with 287 classic "do not touch" (benign cystic lesions, insufficiency fractures, bone islands, bone infarcts) or benign osseous lesions (hemangiomas, enchondromas, osteochondromas, fibrous dysplasia, Paget's disease, osteomyelitis) who underwent
resultsThe ranges of the maximum SUV were as follows: For hemangiomas (0.95-2.99), bone infarcts (0.37-3.44), bone islands (0.26-3.29), enchondromas (0.46-2.69), fibrous dysplasia (0.78-18.63), osteochondromas (1.11-2.56), Paget's disease of bone (0.93-5.65), insufficiency fractures (1.06-12.97) and for osteomyelitis (2.57-12.64). The range of the maximum SUV was lowest for osteochondromas (maximum SUV 2.56) and was highest for fibrous dysplasia (maximum SUV of 18.63). There was at least one lesion that demonstrated greater
conclusionThe classic "do not touch" lesions and classic benign lesions can be
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.