Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31396298›Full record

ArticleOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2019

Tissue-Specific Oxidative Stress Modulation by Exercise: A Comparison between MICT and HIIT in an Obese Rat Model.

Carole Groussard, Florie Maillard, Emilie Vazeille, Nicolas Barnich, Pascal Sirvent, Yolanda F Otero, Lydie Combaret, Elise Madeuf, Antoine Sourdrille, Geoffroy Delcros and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carole GroussardUniv-Rennes, Laboratoire M2S-EA 7470, F-35000 Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9819-7291
Florie MaillardUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire AME2P, EA 3533, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Emilie VazeilleUniversité Clermont Auvergne, M2iSH, UMR 1071 INSERM, UCS INRA 2018, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Nicolas BarnichUniversité Clermont Auvergne, M2iSH, UMR 1071 INSERM, UCS INRA 2018, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Pascal SirventUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire AME2P, EA 3533, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Yolanda F OteroUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire AME2P, EA 3533, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Lydie CombaretINRA, Unité de Nutrition Humaine (UNH, UMR 1019), Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-8700
Elise MadeufUniv Lyon, Université Lyon 1, LIBM EA 742, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2670-4121
Antoine SourdrilleUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire AME2P, EA 3533, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0692-6352
Geoffroy DelcrosUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire AME2P, EA 3533, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Monique EtienneUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire AME2P, EA 3533, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Allison TeixeiraUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire AME2P, EA 3533, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Pierre SauvanetUniversité Clermont Auvergne, M2iSH, UMR 1071 INSERM, UCS INRA 2018, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Vincent PialouxUniv Lyon, Université Lyon 1, LIBM EA 742, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-061X
Nathalie BoisseauUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire AME2P, EA 3533, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Université Clermont Auvergne · FRInserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimExercise is an effective strategy to reduce obesity-induced oxidative stress. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two training modalities (moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT)) on the pro/antioxidant status of different tissues in obese Zucker rats.

methodsEight-week-old male Zucker rats (

resultsCompared with the control, MICT increased GPx and catalase activities and the FRAP level in epididymal adipose tissue. HIIT increased the AOPP level in subcutaneous adipose tissue. In the muscle, HIIT increased both SOD and GPx activities and reduced the AOPP level, whereas MICT increased only SOD activity. Finally, plasma myeloperoxidase content was similarly decreased by both training modalities, whereas oxLDL was reduced only in the MICT group.

conclusionBoth HIIT and MICT improved the pro/antioxidant status. However, HIIT was more efficient than MICT in the skeletal muscle, whereas MICT was more efficient in epididymal adipose tissue. This suggests that oxidative stress responses to HIIT and MICT are tissue-specific. This could result in ROS generation via different pathways in these tissues. From a practical point of view, the two training modalities should be combined to obtain a global response in people with obesity.

Indexed as

Oxidative StressPhysical Conditioning, AnimalAdipose TissueAnimalsAntioxidantsGlutathione PeroxidaseHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingLipoproteins, LDLMaleMalondialdehydeMuscle, SkeletalNADPH OxidasesObesityOxidantsRatsRats, ZuckerAntioxidantsGlutathione PeroxidaseLipoproteins, LDLMalondialdehydeNADPH OxidasesOxidantsoxidized low density lipoproteinSuperoxide Dismutase

Identifiers

PMID31396298
PMCPMC6664693
OpenAlexW2960885171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.