Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31396270›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2019

Driving Fatigue Detection from EEG Using a Modified PCANet Method.

Yuliang Ma, Bin Chen, Rihui Li, Chushan Wang, Jun Wang, Qingshan She, Zhizeng Luo, Yingchun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Driving fatigue detection based on brain source activity and ARMA model.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Deep Learning in Physiological Signal Data: A Survey.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuliang MaIntelligent Control & Robotics Institute, College of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1277-4663
Bin ChenIntelligent Control & Robotics Institute, College of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.
Rihui LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Chushan WangGuangdong Provincial Work Injury Rehabilitation Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Jun WangGuangdong Provincial Work Injury Rehabilitation Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Qingshan SheIntelligent Control & Robotics Institute, College of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-9833
Zhizeng LuoIntelligent Control & Robotics Institute, College of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2689-3455
Yingchun ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1927-4103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of the automotive industry has brought great convenience to our life, which also leads to a dramatic increase in the amount of traffic accidents. A large proportion of traffic accidents were caused by driving fatigue. EEG is considered as a direct, effective, and promising modality to detect driving fatigue. In this study, we presented a novel feature extraction strategy based on a deep learning model to achieve high classification accuracy and efficiency in using EEG for driving fatigue detection. EEG signals were recorded from six healthy volunteers in a simulated driving experiment. The feature extraction strategy was developed by integrating the principal component analysis (PCA) and a deep learning model called PCA network (PCANet). In particular, the principal component analysis (PCA) was used to preprocess EEG data to reduce its dimension in order to overcome the limitation of dimension explosion caused by PCANet, making this approach feasible for EEG-based driving fatigue detection. Results demonstrated high and robust performance of the proposed modified PCANet method with classification accuracy up to 95%, which outperformed the conventional feature extraction strategies in the field. We also identified that the parietal and occipital lobes of the brain were strongly associated with driving fatigue. This is the first study, to the best of our knowledge, to practically apply the modified PCANet technique for EEG-based driving fatigue detection.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyPrincipal Component AnalysisSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAccidents, TrafficAdultAlgorithmsAutomobile DrivingBrainFatigueHumansMaleSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID31396270
PMCPMC6664732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.