ArticleScientific reports2019
Stimulation or Cancellation of Ca
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- MHz compression of pulse packets facilitates remote focusing of electroporation.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Protein-mediated electroporation: Pore formation in a calcium voltage-sensing domain induced by positive and negative nanosecond pulsed electric fields.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Modulating CaBiophysical journal · 2024Article
- Ultra-Low Intensity Post-Pulse Affects Cellular Responses Caused by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Next generation CANCAN focusing for remote stimulation by nanosecond electric pulses.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Protein-Mediated Electroporation in a Cardiac Voltage-Sensing Domain Due to an nsPEF Stimulus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Action spectra and mechanisms of (in) efficiency of bipolar electric pulses at electroporation.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Article
- Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) and vaccines: a novel technique for the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses?Annals of medicine · 2022Article
- Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF): Opening the Biotechnological Pandora's Box.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Concentration of stimulant regulates initial exocytotic molecular plasticity at single cells.Chemical science · 2022Article
- Electroporation and cell killing by milli- to nanosecond pulses and avoiding neuromuscular stimulation in cancer ablation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Exploring the Conformational Changes Induced by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields on the Voltage Sensing Domain of a CaMembranes · 2021Article
- 2-ns Electrostimulation of CaBiophysical journal · 2021Article
- The interplay of excitation and electroporation in nanosecond pulse stimulation.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exposing adrenal chromaffin cells to single 150 to 400 ns electric pulses triggers a rise in intracellular Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.