Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31395879›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of cell lines as models of primary tumors across 22 tumor types.

K Yu, B Chen, D Aran, J Charalel, C Yau, D M Wolf, L J van 't Veer, A J Butte, T Goldstein, M Sirota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reprogramming intratumoral TScience immunology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

K YuBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 94158, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8310-8815
B ChenDepartment of Pediatrics and Human Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, 49503, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8858-874X
D AranBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 94158, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6334-5039
J CharalelDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, CA, USA.
C YauBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, 94945, CA, USA.
D M WolfDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, 94143, CA, USA.
L J van 't VeerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, 94143, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9838-8298
A J ButteBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 94158, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7433-2740
T GoldsteinBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 94158, CA, USA.
M SirotaBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 94158, CA, USA. Marina.Sirota@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Stanford and Northrop Grumman proposal for the Oncology Models ForumU24CA195858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BUTTE, ATUL J · 2015 to 2019
$4.7M
Integrating transcriptomic, proteomic and pharmacogenomic data to inform individualized therapy in cancersK01ES028047 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHEN, BIN · 2017 to 2020
$682k
Targeting glucose metabolism for the treatment of Hepatocellular CarcinomaR21TR001743 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHEN, BIN · 2017 to 2018
$560k
Elucidating the Role of the Genetic and Environmental Determinants of Preterm Birth Using Integrative Computational ApproachesK01LM012381 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SIROTA, MARINA · 2016 to 2018
$531k
NCATS NIH HHS R21 TR001743NCI NIH HHS U24 CA195858NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES028047NLM NIH HHS K01 LM012381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer cell lines are a cornerstone of cancer research but previous studies have shown that not all cell lines are equal in their ability to model primary tumors. Here we present a comprehensive pan-cancer analysis utilizing transcriptomic profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia to evaluate cell lines as models of primary tumors across 22 tumor types. We perform correlation analysis and gene set enrichment analysis to understand the differences between cell lines and primary tumors. Additionally, we classify cell lines into tumor subtypes in 9 tumor types. We present our pancreatic cancer results as a case study and find that the commonly used cell line MIA PaCa-2 is transcriptionally unrepresentative of primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Lastly, we propose a new cell line panel, the TCGA-110-CL, for pan-cancer studies. This study provides a resource to help researchers select more representative cell line models.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticCell Line, TumorDatasets as TopicGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeoplasmsSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID31395879
PMCPMC6687785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.