Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31395750›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2020

Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening.

Laura A V Marlow, Mairead Ryan, Jo Waller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The Use of First-Void Urine to Screen Women Aged 60-79 for HPV in the UK: The Catch-Up Screen Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. "Whilst you are here…" Acceptability of providing advice about screening and early detection of other cancers as part of the breast cancer screening programme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura A V MarlowDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK l.marlow@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1709-2397
Mairead RyanDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Jo WallerDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17219Cancer Research UK C7492/A17219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUptake of cervical screening among women aged 50-64 years is declining. Not feeling at risk because of current sexual behaviour is a reason some older women give for not being screened. We hypothesised that explaining the long interval between acquiring human papillomavirus (HPV) and developing cervical cancer would increase the relevance of screening in older women.

methodsWomen aged 50-64 years (n=597) who did not intend to go for screening were recruited through an online panel and randomised to one of three information conditions:

resultsInformation condition was significantly associated with risk perceptions and intention strength postintervention (F(2,593)=6.26, p=0.002 and F(2,593)=4.98, p=0.007 respectively). Women in the

conclusionsProviding a clear explanation that decouples women's perceived cervical cancer risk from their current sexual behaviour has the potential to increase perceived risk of cervical cancer and intentions to be screened among older women. Providing women with a clear cognitive representation of the aetiology of cervical cancer may be one approach to increasing screening uptake.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriFemaleHumansIntentionMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPerceptionSexual BehaviorUterine Cervical Neoplasmscervical screeningnon-attendersolderpap smearrisk perceptionssaliencetimeline

Identifiers

PMID31395750
PMCPMC7029243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.