ArticleNursing outlook
Advocacy and actions to address disparities in access to genomic health care: A report on a National Academies workshop.
Article in Nursing outlook. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pilot Evaluation of a Digital Pretest Education Platform for Genomic Counseling: Perspectives of Health Care Providers and Patients.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Increasing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in Rare Disease Clinical Trials.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2024Review
- Examining access to care in clinical genomic research and medicine: Experiences from the CSER Consortium.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Equity in Genomics: A Brief Report on Cardiovascular Health Disparities in African American Adults.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingArticle
- Equity and Inclusion in Assessing Hereditary Cancer Risk: Insights From Excluded Communities, Structured Interviews, and Population Genetics.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
- Partnering With Faith Communities to Increase Knowledge of Precision Medicine and Genetic Research in the Black Community.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the United States, access to genomic risk assessment, testing, and follow up care is most easily obtained by those who have sufficient financial, educational, and social resources. Multiple barriers limit the ability of populations without those resources to benefit from health care that integrates genomics in assessment of disease risk, diagnosis, and targeted treatment. PURPOSE: To summarize barriers and potential actions to reduce genomic health care disparities.
methodSummarize authors' views on discussions at a workshop hosted by the National Academy of Medicine. DISCUSSION: Barriers include access to health care providers that utilize genomics, genetic literacy of providers and patients, and absence of evidence of gene variants importance in ancestrally diverse underserved populations.
conclusionEngagement between underserved communities, health care providers, and policy makers is an essential component to raise awareness and seek solutions to barriers in access to genomic health care for all populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.