Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31395390›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2019

Mechanisms of rDNA Copy Number Maintenance.

Jonathan O Nelson, George J Watase, Natalie Warsinger-Pepe, Yukiko M Yamashita

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dynamic evolution and hierarchical regulation of rDNA in polyploid oat.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. RiboScreenBiomedicines · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mechanisms of ribosomopathy and phase separation-related ribosomopathy.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan O NelsonLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
George J WataseLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Natalie Warsinger-PepeLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Yukiko M YamashitaLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: yukikomy@umich.edu.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Career Training in Reproductive BiologyT32HD079342 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Suzanne M MOENTER · 2014 to 2026
$2.3M
Niche-mediated regulation of asymmetric stem cell divisionR01GM118308 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI YAMASHITA, YUKIKO · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNICHD NIH HHS T32 HD079342NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rDNA, the genes encoding the RNA components of ribosomes (rRNA), are highly repetitive in all eukaryotic genomes, containing 100s to 1000s of copies, to meet the demand for ribosome biogenesis. rDNA genes are arranged in large stretches of tandem repeats, forming loci that are highly susceptible to copy loss due to their repetitiveness and active transcription throughout the cell cycle. Despite this inherent instability, rDNA copy number is generally maintained within a particular range in each species, pointing to the presence of mechanisms that maintain rDNA copy number in a homeostatic range. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of these maintenance mechanisms and how they sustain rDNA copy number throughout populations.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsDNA, RibosomalGene DosageAnimalsGenetic LociGerm CellsHumansSpecies SpecificityDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID31395390
PMCPMC6744303
OpenAlexW2964558489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.