Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31395091›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2019

Effectiveness of treatments for acute and sub-acute mechanical non-specific low back pain: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Silvia Gianola, Greta Castellini, Anita Andreano, Davide Corbetta, Pamela Frigerio, Valentina Pecoraro, Valentina Redaelli, Andrea Tettamanti, Andrea Turolla, Lorenzo Moja and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Traditional Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index in patients with low back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Intervertebral Disc DegenerationOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia GianolaUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. silvia.gianola@grupposandonato.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3770-0011
Greta CastelliniUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Anita AndreanoCenter of Biostatistics for Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Davide CorbettaRehabilitation and Functional Recovery Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Pamela FrigerioChild and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Valentina PecoraroDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, OCSAE, Azienda USL of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Valentina RedaelliCasa di Cura del Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Andrea TettamantiRehabilitation and Functional Recovery Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Andrea TurollaLaboratory for Neurorehabilitation Technologies, Fondazione Ospedale San Camillo IRCCS, Venice, Italy.
Lorenzo MojaUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Maria Grazia ValsecchiCenter of Biostatistics for Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAzienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena · ITIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITOspedale generale di zona San Camillo Treviso · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-specific low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Acute LBP usually has a good prognosis, with rapid improvement within the first 6 weeks. However, the majority of patients develop chronic LBP and suffer from recurrences. For clinical management, a plethora of treatments is currently available but evidence of the most effective options is lacking. The objective of this study will be to identify the most effective interventions to relieve pain and reduce disability in acute and sub-acute non-specific LBP. METHODS/

designWe will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL) from inception onwards. The eligible population will be individuals with non-specific LBP older than 18 years, both males and females, who experience pain less than 6 weeks (acute) or between 6 and 12 weeks (subacute). Eligible interventions and comparators will include all conservative rehabilitation or pharmacological treatments provided by any health professional; the only eligible study design will be a randomized controlled trial. The primary outcomes will be pain intensity and back-specific functional status. Secondary outcomes will be any adverse events. Studies published in languages other than English will also potentially be included. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts retrieved from a literature search, as well as potentially relevant full-text articles. General characteristics, potential effect modifiers, and outcome data will be extracted from the included studies, and the risk of bias will be appraised. Conflicts at all levels of screening and abstraction will be resolved through team discussions. After describing the results of the review, if appropriate, a random effects meta-analysis and network meta-analysis will be conducted in a frequentist setting, assuming equal heterogeneity across all treatment comparisons and accounting for correlations induced by multi-arm studies using a multivariate normal model. DISCUSSION: Our systematic review will address the uncertainties in the use of pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatments, and their relative efficacy, for acute and subacute LBP. These findings will be useful for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018102527.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionCognitive Behavioral TherapyDrug TherapyExerciseHumansNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID31395091
PMCPMC6688358
OpenAlexW2968518186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.